Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Grading 1922-D Lincoln Cents
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 7638496, member: 24314"]<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />norantyki, posted: "<font size="4">Here is a link to purchase </font><i><font size="4">A Dictionary of <b><span style="color: #b30000">English Numismatic Terms</span></b> </font></i><font size="4">by Manville, commonly referred to as 'The Glossary.'</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Encyclopaedia-British-Irish-Numismatics-Dictionary/dp/1907427368" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Encyclopaedia-British-Irish-Numismatics-Dictionary/dp/1907427368" rel="nofollow">https://www.amazon.co.uk/Encyclopaedia-British-Irish-Numismatics-Dictionary/dp/1907427368</a></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">The term porosity is still very much current - an indication of how much you interact with others in the trade (<i><span style="color: #336600">porosity, smoothing, etc. are all "fluff" terms THOSE IN THE TRADE use to obscure the actual condition of the coin. I prefer to use "corroded" and "fraudulently altered tooled surface" instead! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> What, not in that dictionary? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />)</span></i></font></p><p><font size="4">and yes, I am implying that <span style="color: #660033"><b><span style="color: #660066">alloy has leeched</span></b> due to environmental damage.</span></font></p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Why not just say the coin is <b><span style="color: #660066">CORRODED</span></b> which is also more misinformation as it is NOT POROUS and NOT CORRODED.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><br /></span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie10" alt=":oops:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> That's just in MHO. Perhaps British chaps see things differently - including things that don't exist. I can only wonder how they describe a "lamination" which is also NOT present on the coin.</span></i></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="4">No insults, no jibes... just fact (which you refer to as 'fluff'). I'm not going to engage you further as it is clear that you are just into spewing insults. I stand very much by what I said, and you haven't actually brought anything to the table to discredit that, other than your opinion. I will say that you have much to learn though..."</font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #006633">There is a big difference between an insult and correcting misinformation in a sarcastic manner. <i><span style="color: #006633">I do have much to learn. <i> Now that is something <b>we can agree on. </b></i><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> In fact, I'm going to buy a copy of that book for my library</span></i>! <i><span style="color: #006600"> Thanks for the link.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></i></span></i></p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600">BTW, as a young professional numismatist, I actually met "Harry" (Mr. Manville to me when we first met) when he lived in DC. We used him on occasion as a consultant. I knew he was a British numismatics scholar yet never knew of any of his publications. Nevertheless:</span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><br /></span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600">AFAIK, this is the U S of A and CT is located in the U S of A. We won the war. What goes on in <span style="color: #b30000">Great Britain </span>is interesting and I agree that it is best to do in England what the English do. While Mr. Manville was (RIP) a respected numismatist who has undoubtedly contributed more to <b><span style="color: #b30000">BRITISH NUMISMATICS</span></b> than I will ever do; I prefer that his definitions of numismatic terms don't corrupt those of the U.S. of A. You see, they do/say things differently across the pond like pooping in a "loo." <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Additionally, if that <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie30" alt=":bucktooth:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> malarkey (non-homogeneous alloys = porosity) you posted about metallurgy is a direct quote from "the glossary," I feel sorry for British collectors. </span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><br /></span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"><br /></span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #006600"></span></i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 7638496, member: 24314"]:hilarious::hilarious:norantyki, posted: "[SIZE=4]Here is a link to purchase [/SIZE][I][SIZE=4]A Dictionary of [B][COLOR=#b30000]English Numismatic Terms[/COLOR][/B] [/SIZE][/I][SIZE=4]by Manville, commonly referred to as 'The Glossary.' [URL]https://www.amazon.co.uk/Encyclopaedia-British-Irish-Numismatics-Dictionary/dp/1907427368[/URL] The term porosity is still very much current - an indication of how much you interact with others in the trade ([I][COLOR=#336600]porosity, smoothing, etc. are all "fluff" terms THOSE IN THE TRADE use to obscure the actual condition of the coin. I prefer to use "corroded" and "fraudulently altered tooled surface" instead! :eek::jawdrop: What, not in that dictionary? :p)[/COLOR][/I] and yes, I am implying that [COLOR=#660033][B][COLOR=#660066]alloy has leeched[/COLOR][/B] due to environmental damage.[/COLOR][/SIZE] [I][COLOR=#006600]:rolleyes: Why not just say the coin is [B][COLOR=#660066]CORRODED[/COLOR][/B] which is also more misinformation as it is NOT POROUS and NOT CORRODED.:D [/COLOR] [COLOR=#006600] :oops: That's just in MHO. Perhaps British chaps see things differently - including things that don't exist. I can only wonder how they describe a "lamination" which is also NOT present on the coin.[/COLOR][/I] [SIZE=4] [SIZE=4]No insults, no jibes... just fact (which you refer to as 'fluff'). I'm not going to engage you further as it is clear that you are just into spewing insults. I stand very much by what I said, and you haven't actually brought anything to the table to discredit that, other than your opinion. I will say that you have much to learn though..."[/SIZE][/SIZE] [I][COLOR=#006633]There is a big difference between an insult and correcting misinformation in a sarcastic manner. [I][COLOR=#006633]I do have much to learn. [I] Now that is something [B]we can agree on. [/B][/I]:D In fact, I'm going to buy a copy of that book for my library[/COLOR][/I]! [I][COLOR=#006600] Thanks for the link.;)[/COLOR][/I][/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=#006600]BTW, as a young professional numismatist, I actually met "Harry" (Mr. Manville to me when we first met) when he lived in DC. We used him on occasion as a consultant. I knew he was a British numismatics scholar yet never knew of any of his publications. Nevertheless: AFAIK, this is the U S of A and CT is located in the U S of A. We won the war. What goes on in [COLOR=#b30000]Great Britain [/COLOR]is interesting and I agree that it is best to do in England what the English do. While Mr. Manville was (RIP) a respected numismatist who has undoubtedly contributed more to [B][COLOR=#b30000]BRITISH NUMISMATICS[/COLOR][/B] than I will ever do; I prefer that his definitions of numismatic terms don't corrupt those of the U.S. of A. You see, they do/say things differently across the pond like pooping in a "loo." :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious: Additionally, if that :bucktooth: malarkey (non-homogeneous alloys = porosity) you posted about metallurgy is a direct quote from "the glossary," I feel sorry for British collectors. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#006600] [/COLOR][/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Grading 1922-D Lincoln Cents
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...