Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Grading 1922-D Lincoln Cents
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="norantyki, post: 7634445, member: 118879"][USER=24314]@Insider[/USER] in numismatic terms, porosity refers to where other alloys have either melted or leached out of a flan during the minting process (usually in the case of silver coin), or environmentally (usually in the case of copper or bronze coin, owing to how they are alloyed). Check the Glossary of Numismatics. Rather than mocking me (even though we appear to agree in this case in principle), please understand how terms are properly applied in numismatic contexts. This coin has porous surfaces, especially on the reverse, where there are numerous planchet flaws inconsistent with circulation. I have used the term correctly... apparently you need a refresher.</p><p><br /></p><p>Going back to the coin, I maintain, regardless of its initial disparency in strike between the obv and rev, it has undergone substantial environmental damage (including mechanical and natural) wear, as well as cleaning that have rendered it pretty much useless to any discussion of strike quality at branch mints.</p><p><br /></p><p>*edit, please stop going back and editing your posts to try to discredit me, which is what you have done... and if so, please mark the edits so that I can address them. I also don't feel the need to use clipart to get my point across - I just know what I am talking about.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="norantyki, post: 7634445, member: 118879"][USER=24314]@Insider[/USER] in numismatic terms, porosity refers to where other alloys have either melted or leached out of a flan during the minting process (usually in the case of silver coin), or environmentally (usually in the case of copper or bronze coin, owing to how they are alloyed). Check the Glossary of Numismatics. Rather than mocking me (even though we appear to agree in this case in principle), please understand how terms are properly applied in numismatic contexts. This coin has porous surfaces, especially on the reverse, where there are numerous planchet flaws inconsistent with circulation. I have used the term correctly... apparently you need a refresher. Going back to the coin, I maintain, regardless of its initial disparency in strike between the obv and rev, it has undergone substantial environmental damage (including mechanical and natural) wear, as well as cleaning that have rendered it pretty much useless to any discussion of strike quality at branch mints. *edit, please stop going back and editing your posts to try to discredit me, which is what you have done... and if so, please mark the edits so that I can address them. I also don't feel the need to use clipart to get my point across - I just know what I am talking about.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Grading 1922-D Lincoln Cents
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...