Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Gradeflation
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 2340325, member: 76863"]Someone who is supposedly as good of a photographer as you are should then understand that a small detail such as the liberty bans details can look better or worse based off of the quality of photo and lighting. </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/1870-Indian-Head-Cent-NGC-XF-40-/222014264754?hash=item33b114d5b2:g:NekAAOSw--1WslVM" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/1870-Indian-Head-Cent-NGC-XF-40-/222014264754?hash=item33b114d5b2:g:NekAAOSw--1WslVM" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebay.com/itm/1870-Indian-Head-Cent-NGC-XF-40-/222014264754?hash=item33b114d5b2:g:NekAAOSw--1WslVM</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Look at that listing as an example. First picture it looks like liberty is missing or rubbed away but the better picture its clearly there. There is a little over 200 40 or 45 PCGS/NGC Indians on ebay right now. The photo quality of them is atrocious on a good number of them making it look like liberty is missing yet any objective person could see the photo is to bad to make any conclusions about the level of detail on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Quite frankly looking at a few coin pictures on ebay and coming to wide spread spread grading conclusions based off of one qualifier is rather amateurish. As I said he should be better than that type of sloppy work. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I see you ignored the part about Rick Snow who actually did some legitimate research coming to more reasonable conclusions. Go on though with the personal attack when proven wrong, just reminds me of all the valuation threads where you gave people opinions instead of facts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 2340325, member: 76863"]Someone who is supposedly as good of a photographer as you are should then understand that a small detail such as the liberty bans details can look better or worse based off of the quality of photo and lighting. [url]http://www.ebay.com/itm/1870-Indian-Head-Cent-NGC-XF-40-/222014264754?hash=item33b114d5b2:g:NekAAOSw--1WslVM[/url] Look at that listing as an example. First picture it looks like liberty is missing or rubbed away but the better picture its clearly there. There is a little over 200 40 or 45 PCGS/NGC Indians on ebay right now. The photo quality of them is atrocious on a good number of them making it look like liberty is missing yet any objective person could see the photo is to bad to make any conclusions about the level of detail on the coin. Quite frankly looking at a few coin pictures on ebay and coming to wide spread spread grading conclusions based off of one qualifier is rather amateurish. As I said he should be better than that type of sloppy work. I see you ignored the part about Rick Snow who actually did some legitimate research coming to more reasonable conclusions. Go on though with the personal attack when proven wrong, just reminds me of all the valuation threads where you gave people opinions instead of facts.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Gradeflation
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...