Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Gradeflation
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2339862, member: 24314"]In order to fully understand Bower's comments and the move toward more liberal grading I believe a collector must be over fifty and will have gone through all the changes themselves. I know several of us on CT fit that description. Yes, TopcCatCoin, virtually any high AU with eye appeal has gone up a grade. Most AU gold has; and many major rarities have (Some even went from XF to Unc). If a grader questions this, the TPGS reply is along the lines of: "Grading has evolved as we (TPGS) learned more." </p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>If you actually believe TPGS grades are meaningless...IMO, you are living in a dream world. Please state your case. Are they meaningless because two similar MS-65's bring different prices? Are they meaningless because YOU (and I) don't agree with 'the "market grading of today? Please tell us.</p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>He said it in his first printing of the guide years ago. It's OLD NEWS! And for you younger collectors, Bowers was one of the dealers who started the slide toward more liberal grading than was being practiced.</p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>Can't say for sure, but It certainly looks like it.</p><p> </p><p>In the end, you either go with the flow or drown while sticking to the old standard. In a few years most of us will be dead and the new standards of today will be old - an possibly still evolving. Try to imagine how an Eric Newman feels about coins he purchased as VF/XF are now AU/Unc.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2339862, member: 24314"]In order to fully understand Bower's comments and the move toward more liberal grading I believe a collector must be over fifty and will have gone through all the changes themselves. I know several of us on CT fit that description. Yes, TopcCatCoin, virtually any high AU with eye appeal has gone up a grade. Most AU gold has; and many major rarities have (Some even went from XF to Unc). If a grader questions this, the TPGS reply is along the lines of: "Grading has evolved as we (TPGS) learned more." If you actually believe TPGS grades are meaningless...IMO, you are living in a dream world. Please state your case. Are they meaningless because two similar MS-65's bring different prices? Are they meaningless because YOU (and I) don't agree with 'the "market grading of today? Please tell us. He said it in his first printing of the guide years ago. It's OLD NEWS! And for you younger collectors, Bowers was one of the dealers who started the slide toward more liberal grading than was being practiced. Can't say for sure, but It certainly looks like it. In the end, you either go with the flow or drown while sticking to the old standard. In a few years most of us will be dead and the new standards of today will be old - an possibly still evolving. Try to imagine how an Eric Newman feels about coins he purchased as VF/XF are now AU/Unc.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Gradeflation
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...