Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 1730285, member: 66&quot;]The comment about &quot;law enforcement officers&quot; was a sarcastic commentary referring to his employees having to file all the items needed for legal compliance, not security guards.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The bill referred to the attempted state legislation which as you said did not pass.&nbsp; The $1000 fine was for violation of the local Aurora city legislation.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As in being required to provide digital images, so he provided digital images made with a scanner and then being fined because his digital images came from a scanner and not a digital camera.&nbsp; I&#039;d have to see the law, but does it say images from a digital camera or does it just say digital images?&nbsp; Governments are good at asking for things and then getting upset because you didn&#039;t do them a specific way that was not specified.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You have it worked out how?&nbsp; A specific amendment to the legislation?&nbsp; Legislation specifically exempting you from that particular reporting requirement?&nbsp; Or just a gentleman&#039;s agreement between you and the city clerks office?&nbsp; because if it is the &quot;gentleman&#039;s agreement&quot; route, at any time they could come back on you and claim multiple violations of the ordinance because the law does not recognize your &quot;gentleman&#039;s agreement&quot;.&nbsp; Multi-thousands of dollars in fines please.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in