Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 2002178, member: 15199&quot;]You make a point, but</p><p>my thought as to a DD, hasn&#039;t changed, still no. The 1963 is certainly a single digit doubling, but being a type VIII, tilted hub, if the 5 was doubled ( it is not), the 9 would have been also as type VIII usually are doubled towards the center or towards the edge. Show me one where the VIII doubling would produce a DD in the interior of the date only and I would reconsider. But yes that is a nice example, here is mine.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i455.photobucket.com/albums/qq279/desertgem/1963ddodate-1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>Are you saying that not only is the 59&nbsp; a doubled die, but it is a undiscovered DD, and a different type than the real 1959 DDO</p><p><a href="http://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1959&amp;die_id=1959p1do001&amp;die_state=eds" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1959&amp;die_id=1959p1do001&amp;die_state=eds" rel="nofollow">http://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1959&amp;die_id=1959p1do001&amp;die_state=eds</a></p><p><br /></p><p>( <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> just putting words in your mouth NK, as I don&#039;t think your are.) <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in