Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Got Wood?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EyeEatWheaties, post: 1117823, member: 26972"]This Message Board is badly in need of a Photography forum. As digital imagery becomes more and more readily accessible - the questions consistently seem to be pouring in exponentially.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am happy to help and share because I am convinced that this is the future and that a lens can pick up far more than the eye and brain can process. There is another whole part to this and that is the interpretation of what you are actually seeing or not seeing in a digital image. For example, I think it is widely accepted that Hi res digital images make a coin look worse than it does in hand. In full resolution you are looking at my Lincolns at 50x - that is nuts! However I love them - but I also understand those certain anomalies.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am focused on Lincolns for the most part and while what I write should apply to all coins I think it is important to point out that I don't have 1/100th the experience with silver/nickel/gold that I do with copper. </p><p><br /></p><p>Photography as is grading a coin, an art. So one persons likes/dislikes may not be another's.</p><p><br /></p><p>First off. I am using PHotobucket Pro to host my images. I think it is about $25 per year. the pro account apparently does not change the original file when uploaded, if it does, it is not much. I have my link settings set to the largest resolution allowed which is 4000x3000 - I have coin compositions larger than that however I rarely post them.. These large images may slow peoples computers down and I have seen it mentioned over and over that they are resizing the forum width unacceptably to other members. I am pretty sure this is due their browser settings though I am not 100% about that .</p><p><br /></p><p>Second - my images are from a camera. I found that professional quality equipment can be bought used for a quarter of the new cost. I using a Canon 40d and Canon 100mm Macro lens.</p><p><br /></p><p>Third - I feel that the most important part of coin imaging, is that the coin must be viewed on a monitor through the camera with all the settings applied BEFORE the shutter is released. I set my lens to manual and crank the camera up and down to bring the coin into focus. I have my DOF set very very shallow - if I focus on the Lincoln high points the field are slightly out of focus and visa versa. </p><p><br /></p><p>Fourth - Lighting - is oh so critical to capture a coins attributes. this is where imaging a coin becomes an art. I use a 3 light set up and am careful to keep those lights in the same position - there are exceptions to that rule...</p><p><br /></p><p> I feel strongly that certain coins should be shown certain ways. I have my lighting set in a manner that I think is a good balance of capturing luster without hiding too much detail. For example: a same year/mint 65RD can have very different attributes than another same year/mint 67RD - For example I have 67RD that have more nicks and dings than a 65RD HOWEVER the 67RD has a far superior luster and in hand this becomes obvious but in a digital image those nicks and dings on the 67RD may be distracting. this is where knowledge of what you are actually looking at and interpreting that image gets confusing. What one person sees initially is not necessarily what another person sees/or looks for. </p><p><br /></p><p>So with all of that. a picture is worth a thousand more words. This is my set up - bought this fall - with no prior photography experience - learning what I could from the internet - for under 1k via the Bay. the coin on the monitor in the background is the coin under the lens. The lights to the right are included for discussion purposes - I don't use them. </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z242/papasteeze/Coins/PB140010Large.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I just noticed that I need to update my set up pic. That lens on that camera is not what I am currently using. That lens is a Nikor 35-70mm adapted to fit a Canon body with extension rings added for high magnification. (in case anyone notices) <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EyeEatWheaties, post: 1117823, member: 26972"]This Message Board is badly in need of a Photography forum. As digital imagery becomes more and more readily accessible - the questions consistently seem to be pouring in exponentially. I am happy to help and share because I am convinced that this is the future and that a lens can pick up far more than the eye and brain can process. There is another whole part to this and that is the interpretation of what you are actually seeing or not seeing in a digital image. For example, I think it is widely accepted that Hi res digital images make a coin look worse than it does in hand. In full resolution you are looking at my Lincolns at 50x - that is nuts! However I love them - but I also understand those certain anomalies. I am focused on Lincolns for the most part and while what I write should apply to all coins I think it is important to point out that I don't have 1/100th the experience with silver/nickel/gold that I do with copper. Photography as is grading a coin, an art. So one persons likes/dislikes may not be another's. First off. I am using PHotobucket Pro to host my images. I think it is about $25 per year. the pro account apparently does not change the original file when uploaded, if it does, it is not much. I have my link settings set to the largest resolution allowed which is 4000x3000 - I have coin compositions larger than that however I rarely post them.. These large images may slow peoples computers down and I have seen it mentioned over and over that they are resizing the forum width unacceptably to other members. I am pretty sure this is due their browser settings though I am not 100% about that . Second - my images are from a camera. I found that professional quality equipment can be bought used for a quarter of the new cost. I using a Canon 40d and Canon 100mm Macro lens. Third - I feel that the most important part of coin imaging, is that the coin must be viewed on a monitor through the camera with all the settings applied BEFORE the shutter is released. I set my lens to manual and crank the camera up and down to bring the coin into focus. I have my DOF set very very shallow - if I focus on the Lincoln high points the field are slightly out of focus and visa versa. Fourth - Lighting - is oh so critical to capture a coins attributes. this is where imaging a coin becomes an art. I use a 3 light set up and am careful to keep those lights in the same position - there are exceptions to that rule... I feel strongly that certain coins should be shown certain ways. I have my lighting set in a manner that I think is a good balance of capturing luster without hiding too much detail. For example: a same year/mint 65RD can have very different attributes than another same year/mint 67RD - For example I have 67RD that have more nicks and dings than a 65RD HOWEVER the 67RD has a far superior luster and in hand this becomes obvious but in a digital image those nicks and dings on the 67RD may be distracting. this is where knowledge of what you are actually looking at and interpreting that image gets confusing. What one person sees initially is not necessarily what another person sees/or looks for. So with all of that. a picture is worth a thousand more words. This is my set up - bought this fall - with no prior photography experience - learning what I could from the internet - for under 1k via the Bay. the coin on the monitor in the background is the coin under the lens. The lights to the right are included for discussion purposes - I don't use them. [IMG]http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z242/papasteeze/Coins/PB140010Large.jpg[/IMG] I just noticed that I need to update my set up pic. That lens on that camera is not what I am currently using. That lens is a Nikor 35-70mm adapted to fit a Canon body with extension rings added for high magnification. (in case anyone notices) :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Got Wood?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...