Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;gatzdon, post: 340572, member: 8247&quot;]In order to help Numbers out, we need to understand what Numbers is looking for.&nbsp; Numbers has dissected the methodology by which the BEP operates and numbers their notes.&nbsp; Once this is understood, one only needs a handful of known numbers to estimate (and eventually determine) the details about various BEP runs.</p><p><br /></p><p>Numbers has tables on his website with known ranges, and predicted (or possible) ranges.&nbsp; For the known ranges, Numbers didn&#039;t need reports for serial numbers that fall within those ranges.&nbsp; For unknown ranges, but possible, Numbers would gladly welcome a confirmation of an actual note in that particular range, but only needs a single report to verify the range&#039;s existance.&nbsp; Numbers lists out on the survey page which ranges he has already received confirmation for.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example *63639111A and *00586882A are not within the ranges that he is seeking verification (meaning that there was no question that these serial numbers were printed).&nbsp; *02035176A falls within a range he wanted to verify, but it has already been verified.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now what would be interesting is if that $2 bill really is a 1963 as Numbers reports that the number *00942026A was used for 1963A $2 bills.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ll admit that Numbers explanation is a little dry (please take no offense to that Numbers), but after I read it through a couple times, his logic is starting to make sense to me.&nbsp; Personally, I think Numbers has finally collected enough information to make it worth his time to put out a publication.</p><p><br /></p><p>PS. Numbers, please read through my post and make sure I&#039;m interpreting everything correctly?&nbsp; Thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in