Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Got Nabatean?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1643466, member: 42773"]After further research, I'm not sure my coin is properly attributed - it may be an issue of Aretas IV. Here is my reasoning...</p><p><br /></p><p>First of all, I have not made an error in distinguishing between the open and closed Mim versions of MLHU issues. One can find many examples among the Malichus II Jugate/Cornucopiae coins wherein the Mim is open, but the legend clearly spells MLHU. Here is one example...</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s3.postimage.org/lv050thf7/MLHU.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>However, Aretas IV also issued coins of this design a generation earlier, featuring a jugate portrait on the obverse, crossed cornucopiae on the reverse with names of both the king and queen. To complicate matters, his queen was also named Shekilat, and to even further complicate matters, the first letter of Aretas' name in Nabatean is spelled with Hēth - which is one of the letters easily confused with the open Mim.</p><p><br /></p><p>There may be design elements or a provenance to my coin that clearly attribute it to Malichus II, but I'm not aware of those yet. I simply trusted the dealer's attribution. The problem with that is that I found a handful of improperly attributed pieces on vcoins, even among the most reputable dealers, and that called into question the attribution of my coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now the spelling of Aretas in Nabatean is Hēth, Rēsh, Tau, Tau, or HRTT in the Roman. Here's a fine example of this issue under his reign...</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s4.postimage.org/3me86ggel/aretas3.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p>It is possible that my coin has the legend HRTT (Aretas). In fact, it seems to fit the picture better than MLHU, but it's difficult to say since part of the legend is missing.</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://postimage.org/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://postimage.org/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://s7.postimage.org/3rxqv7j3v/malichusaretas.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a></p> <p style="text-align: center"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I've contacted the dealer to see what diagnostics he used to attribute the coin - it's entirely likely that I'm missing something, but if one goes by the king's name itself, it would appear that HRTT fits better than MLHU.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1643466, member: 42773"]After further research, I'm not sure my coin is properly attributed - it may be an issue of Aretas IV. Here is my reasoning... First of all, I have not made an error in distinguishing between the open and closed Mim versions of MLHU issues. One can find many examples among the Malichus II Jugate/Cornucopiae coins wherein the Mim is open, but the legend clearly spells MLHU. Here is one example... [CENTER][URL="http://postimage.org/"][IMG]http://s3.postimage.org/lv050thf7/MLHU.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/CENTER] However, Aretas IV also issued coins of this design a generation earlier, featuring a jugate portrait on the obverse, crossed cornucopiae on the reverse with names of both the king and queen. To complicate matters, his queen was also named Shekilat, and to even further complicate matters, the first letter of Aretas' name in Nabatean is spelled with Hēth - which is one of the letters easily confused with the open Mim. There may be design elements or a provenance to my coin that clearly attribute it to Malichus II, but I'm not aware of those yet. I simply trusted the dealer's attribution. The problem with that is that I found a handful of improperly attributed pieces on vcoins, even among the most reputable dealers, and that called into question the attribution of my coin. Now the spelling of Aretas in Nabatean is Hēth, Rēsh, Tau, Tau, or HRTT in the Roman. Here's a fine example of this issue under his reign... [CENTER][URL="http://postimage.org/"][IMG]http://s4.postimage.org/3me86ggel/aretas3.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/CENTER] It is possible that my coin has the legend HRTT (Aretas). In fact, it seems to fit the picture better than MLHU, but it's difficult to say since part of the legend is missing. [CENTER][URL="http://postimage.org/"][IMG]http://s7.postimage.org/3rxqv7j3v/malichusaretas.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/CENTER] I've contacted the dealer to see what diagnostics he used to attribute the coin - it's entirely likely that I'm missing something, but if one goes by the king's name itself, it would appear that HRTT fits better than MLHU.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Got Nabatean?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...