Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Got A Potin
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2550432, member: 56859"]"Potin" seems to be a vague term meaning "pot metal": base metal with little to no silver. As Mat has pointed out many times, these "mutt" metals seem prone to accelerated corrosion.</p><p><br /></p><p>That hasn't stopped me from snarfing them up <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />, although I do inspect them carefully, preemptively treat if there is any question, and store them carefully.</p><p><br /></p><p>Most of my later Roman Egypt tetradrachms (in other words, those made from these extremely debased metals) came from a few large group lots. I've since become more selective in purchasing. Note that "selective" doesn't always equal "smart", as evidenced by my recent ex-Dattari purchases. I'm a sucker for an old pedigree and plate coins <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>The first and second century tetradrachms of Roman Egypt were made from an alloy called billon-- a word I misread for three years before Warren Esty pointed out that it wasn't "bill<b>i</b>on" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie10" alt=":oops:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. Billon tetradrachms had varying degrees of silver, declining to ~10% by Gallienus and then down to little or none in following years. Even the high silver content tetradrachms often look pretty bad when compared to silver Imperial coins. <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.wixstatic.com%2Fmedia%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg%2Fv1%2Ffill%2Fw_960%2Ch_493%2Cal_c%2Clg_1%2Cq_90%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg&hash=5458dfff41a6c35e28d88729b8be4e44" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.wixstatic.com%2Fmedia%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg%2Fv1%2Ffill%2Fw_960%2Ch_493%2Cal_c%2Clg_1%2Cq_90%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg&hash=5458dfff41a6c35e28d88729b8be4e44">My first Alexandrian tetradrachm was of Antoninus Pius</a>, part of a small group lot, and I thought it was the ugliest coin I'd ever seen. I almost gave it away. Now I love them. It makes me reluctant to sell or give away any coins which I currently view as unappealing. Who knows how I might feel about them next year?</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are two of my favorite potin tetradrachms.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_ff6055d603b844998942ed2bc3a1859e.jpg/v1/fill/w_1000,h_513,al_c,q_90/ae43f8_ff6055d603b844998942ed2bc3a1859e.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>EGYPT, Alexandria. Claudius II Gothicus</b></p><p>year 1, CE 268</p><p>tetradrachm</p><p>Obv: AVTKKΛAΔIOCCEB; laureate draped bust right</p><p>Rev: eagle standing right, head left, wreath in beak; L- A in right field</p><p>Ref: Emmett 3878(1), R1</p><p><i>purchased from a mostly non-ancient coin dealer at WFOM, Chicago, Aug. 2014. A common coin with an unexciting reverse but of exceptional artistry.</i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i><img src="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_511712208cf2410296452349553cc95f~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_1000,h_625,al_c,q_90/ae43f8_511712208cf2410296452349553cc95f~mv2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </i></p><p><b>EGYPT, Alexandria. Diocletian</b></p><p>year 11, CE 294/5</p><p>tetradrachm, 19 mm, 7.6 gm</p><p>Obv: ΔIOKΛHTIANOCCEB; laureate head right</p><p>Rev: Draped bust of Selene right, crescent before; L IA behind</p><p>Ref: Emmett 4080.11, R5</p><p><i>An unusually well-struck and well-preserved late Roman Egypt tetradrachm with an interesting reverse.</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 2550432, member: 56859"]"Potin" seems to be a vague term meaning "pot metal": base metal with little to no silver. As Mat has pointed out many times, these "mutt" metals seem prone to accelerated corrosion. That hasn't stopped me from snarfing them up :D, although I do inspect them carefully, preemptively treat if there is any question, and store them carefully. Most of my later Roman Egypt tetradrachms (in other words, those made from these extremely debased metals) came from a few large group lots. I've since become more selective in purchasing. Note that "selective" doesn't always equal "smart", as evidenced by my recent ex-Dattari purchases. I'm a sucker for an old pedigree and plate coins :). The first and second century tetradrachms of Roman Egypt were made from an alloy called billon-- a word I misread for three years before Warren Esty pointed out that it wasn't "bill[B]i[/B]on" :oops:. Billon tetradrachms had varying degrees of silver, declining to ~10% by Gallienus and then down to little or none in following years. Even the high silver content tetradrachms often look pretty bad when compared to silver Imperial coins. [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.wixstatic.com%2Fmedia%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg%2Fv1%2Ffill%2Fw_960%2Ch_493%2Cal_c%2Clg_1%2Cq_90%2Fae43f8_f026410b962d4063a80dbde2389d77b8.jpg&hash=5458dfff41a6c35e28d88729b8be4e44']My first Alexandrian tetradrachm was of Antoninus Pius[/URL], part of a small group lot, and I thought it was the ugliest coin I'd ever seen. I almost gave it away. Now I love them. It makes me reluctant to sell or give away any coins which I currently view as unappealing. Who knows how I might feel about them next year? Here are two of my favorite potin tetradrachms. [IMG]https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_ff6055d603b844998942ed2bc3a1859e.jpg/v1/fill/w_1000,h_513,al_c,q_90/ae43f8_ff6055d603b844998942ed2bc3a1859e.jpg[/IMG] [B]EGYPT, Alexandria. Claudius II Gothicus[/B] year 1, CE 268 tetradrachm Obv: AVTKKΛAΔIOCCEB; laureate draped bust right Rev: eagle standing right, head left, wreath in beak; L- A in right field Ref: Emmett 3878(1), R1 [I]purchased from a mostly non-ancient coin dealer at WFOM, Chicago, Aug. 2014. A common coin with an unexciting reverse but of exceptional artistry. [IMG]https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ae43f8_511712208cf2410296452349553cc95f~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_1000,h_625,al_c,q_90/ae43f8_511712208cf2410296452349553cc95f~mv2.jpg[/IMG] [/I] [B]EGYPT, Alexandria. Diocletian[/B] year 11, CE 294/5 tetradrachm, 19 mm, 7.6 gm Obv: ΔIOKΛHTIANOCCEB; laureate head right Rev: Draped bust of Selene right, crescent before; L IA behind Ref: Emmett 4080.11, R5 [I]An unusually well-struck and well-preserved late Roman Egypt tetradrachm with an interesting reverse.[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Got A Potin
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...