Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;maridvnvm, post: 4098121, member: 31620&quot;]Many thanks [USER=89514]@curtislclay[/USER].</p><p>I take it that the implication of this is that my assertion that it is from Antioch is incorrect and the it is in fact from Rome?</p><p>I have not seen the Bland dissertation but had spend some time comparing to a variety of other resources including people specialising in this series. I must admit to only having a passing interest in these and only purchase things that catch my eye.</p><p>One site that led me to believe that this could be Antioch is shown below:-</p><p><a href="http://mihalkam.ancients.info/giiiric5.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://mihalkam.ancients.info/giiiric5.html" rel="nofollow">http://mihalkam.ancients.info/giiiric5.html</a></p><p>There are two illustrated examples shown as RIC 200 and RIC 200 var. The RIC 200 coins seemed very close in style to mine and also had the spear as opposed to the scepter. The second has an obverse legend error of GORIANVS but has the scepter as opposed to the spear.</p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Martin[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in