Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Gordian III (238-244 AD), AR Antoninianus, Rome mint, 240 AD, RIC 71, Sear 8669, RSC 388
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8212459, member: 110350"][USER=117268]@Amit Vyas[/USER] and [USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER], I'm sorry I neglected to mention the other two "usual suspects" besides the emperor for the portrayal accompanying a VIRTVS legend when it isn't Virtus herself being depicted, namely Mars and "a soldier." (If I recall correctly, the latter is how RIC usually identifies the figure.)</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, I wouldn't rely too much on David Sear when it comes to Virtus: for some reason, he seems unwilling to recognize the overwhelming weight of authority (scholarly, grammatical, and numismatic) agreeing that Virtus, when portrayed as such, is a female personification -- for details, you can do a search for my previous posts on the subject using "Virtus" and "female" as the search terms. Inexplicably, in the glossary in front of each volume of RCV, he identifies her as a male personification.</p><p><br /></p><p>Looking at the other examples of these two Gordian III "VIRTVS AVG" types available on VCoins, it's rather clear from the best-preserved specimens that all the ones showing Virtus holding a branch on the reverse and having the same obverse legend as your coin (as well as at least one with the "PIVS" obverse legend) portray a male figure, mostly wearing what appears to be a cuirass completely covering his chest up to the neck; some certainly seem to be bearded. And that all the ones showing Virtus without a branch, with her hand on her shield, with the "M ANT" obverse legend, are portraying Virtus herself, with a bare right breast.</p><p><br /></p><p>Some examples of the male figure, one of them a sestertius with the PIVS legend:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1441119[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1441120[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1441121[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Two examples of the female figure:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1441122[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1441123[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>No matter how well-informed they usually are, 98% of dealers entirely miss this distinction when they describe "VIRTVS" coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8212459, member: 110350"][USER=117268]@Amit Vyas[/USER] and [USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER], I'm sorry I neglected to mention the other two "usual suspects" besides the emperor for the portrayal accompanying a VIRTVS legend when it isn't Virtus herself being depicted, namely Mars and "a soldier." (If I recall correctly, the latter is how RIC usually identifies the figure.) By the way, I wouldn't rely too much on David Sear when it comes to Virtus: for some reason, he seems unwilling to recognize the overwhelming weight of authority (scholarly, grammatical, and numismatic) agreeing that Virtus, when portrayed as such, is a female personification -- for details, you can do a search for my previous posts on the subject using "Virtus" and "female" as the search terms. Inexplicably, in the glossary in front of each volume of RCV, he identifies her as a male personification. Looking at the other examples of these two Gordian III "VIRTVS AVG" types available on VCoins, it's rather clear from the best-preserved specimens that all the ones showing Virtus holding a branch on the reverse and having the same obverse legend as your coin (as well as at least one with the "PIVS" obverse legend) portray a male figure, mostly wearing what appears to be a cuirass completely covering his chest up to the neck; some certainly seem to be bearded. And that all the ones showing Virtus without a branch, with her hand on her shield, with the "M ANT" obverse legend, are portraying Virtus herself, with a bare right breast. Some examples of the male figure, one of them a sestertius with the PIVS legend: [ATTACH=full]1441119[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1441120[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1441121[/ATTACH] Two examples of the female figure: [ATTACH=full]1441122[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1441123[/ATTACH] No matter how well-informed they usually are, 98% of dealers entirely miss this distinction when they describe "VIRTVS" coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Gordian III (238-244 AD), AR Antoninianus, Rome mint, 240 AD, RIC 71, Sear 8669, RSC 388
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...