Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Geta Sestertius - VOTA PUBLICA - Why can't the people who clean and smooth these be more careful!!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 25502201, member: 91820"]I recently purchased a beautiful Geta sestertius with a medallic flan weighing almost 27 grams, with VOTA PUBLICA on the reverse, RIC 187:[ATTACH=full]1632617[/ATTACH]. Unfortunately the coin is not only slightly over polished on the obverse, the smoothing on the reverse removed an important detail - that is, there should be a bull peering around the alter. I have to assume that whoever smoothed the coin didn't bother to check to see what it was supposed to look like and simply filed over the bull. Despite this, I was quite happy with the coin, and extremely happy at the purchase price. It is also quite rare - I could only find five other examples on acsearch.info. - including a die match that shows the bull - of course.</p><p><br /></p><p>The other coin shown is a match of the same VOTA PUBLICA type by Caracalla. I assume both were struck during the one year period when Caracalla and Geta shared the empire after the death of Septimius - although it might be a bit earlier - however Geta's portrait appears to be consistent with the last or second to last types struck for him. Compare the Geta sestertius with the same type:[ATTACH=full]1632618[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Although very worn, the reverse on this coin clearly shows the sacrificial bull around the alter. This type is also quite rare - I was able to only find five other examples on acsearch.info. four of which are quite worn and one of which is quite tooled. This coin might have been struck earlier than Geta's- but I assume both were struck at the same time. Research should answer this and hopefully I can find the time to supplement this article.</p><p><br /></p><p>I wish I had time to explain the meaning of VOTA PUBLICA, I really should know this, perhaps someone can do that in the comments, this is RIC 513.</p><p><br /></p><p>And, finally, there is no way to prove it, but I suspect that the dies for both coins were engraved by the same celator. It would be great if there was a way to show this.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for rarity, one of these days I can write my article on rarity and the sestertii of Septimius Severus and immediate family - I had some surprises when I researched this topic which I need to put on paper. And of course the long awaited article on the comparative portraiture of an aspect of Caracalla's sestertii of which I have written in my head a dozen times - speaking of time - there is never enough of it!!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 25502201, member: 91820"]I recently purchased a beautiful Geta sestertius with a medallic flan weighing almost 27 grams, with VOTA PUBLICA on the reverse, RIC 187:[ATTACH=full]1632617[/ATTACH]. Unfortunately the coin is not only slightly over polished on the obverse, the smoothing on the reverse removed an important detail - that is, there should be a bull peering around the alter. I have to assume that whoever smoothed the coin didn't bother to check to see what it was supposed to look like and simply filed over the bull. Despite this, I was quite happy with the coin, and extremely happy at the purchase price. It is also quite rare - I could only find five other examples on acsearch.info. - including a die match that shows the bull - of course. The other coin shown is a match of the same VOTA PUBLICA type by Caracalla. I assume both were struck during the one year period when Caracalla and Geta shared the empire after the death of Septimius - although it might be a bit earlier - however Geta's portrait appears to be consistent with the last or second to last types struck for him. Compare the Geta sestertius with the same type:[ATTACH=full]1632618[/ATTACH] Although very worn, the reverse on this coin clearly shows the sacrificial bull around the alter. This type is also quite rare - I was able to only find five other examples on acsearch.info. four of which are quite worn and one of which is quite tooled. This coin might have been struck earlier than Geta's- but I assume both were struck at the same time. Research should answer this and hopefully I can find the time to supplement this article. I wish I had time to explain the meaning of VOTA PUBLICA, I really should know this, perhaps someone can do that in the comments, this is RIC 513. And, finally, there is no way to prove it, but I suspect that the dies for both coins were engraved by the same celator. It would be great if there was a way to show this. As for rarity, one of these days I can write my article on rarity and the sestertii of Septimius Severus and immediate family - I had some surprises when I researched this topic which I need to put on paper. And of course the long awaited article on the comparative portraiture of an aspect of Caracalla's sestertii of which I have written in my head a dozen times - speaking of time - there is never enough of it!!![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Geta Sestertius - VOTA PUBLICA - Why can't the people who clean and smooth these be more careful!!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...