Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;coinman0456, post: 1046305, member: 18177&quot;]O.K. It looks as if Condor&#039;s attribution is correct after all. The medal &quot; nak&quot; is questioning is an 1863 after all and not an 1865 as I had been thinking. I stand corrected. Idler did however issue 1865&#039;s using the same obv and rev simply changing &quot; Wilson&#039;s &quot; to W. Idler . In the end, it&#039;s still a prize to have found that in circulation no less. <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/NGC-AU-Civil-War-TOKEN-F-110-442-George-Washington-NY-/320622830736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;hash=item4aa69c2490#ht_500wt_1156" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://cgi.ebay.com/NGC-AU-Civil-War-TOKEN-F-110-442-George-Washington-NY-/320622830736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;hash=item4aa69c2490#ht_500wt_1156" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/NGC-AU-Civil-War-TOKEN-F-110-442-George-Washington-NY-/320622830736?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&amp;hash=item4aa69c2490#ht_500wt_1156</a> another issue to view.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in