Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tom B, post: 1584873, member: 11854&quot;]I hadn&#039;t noticed the 1902 when I first looked at the images.&nbsp; That coin has also been boinked.&nbsp; The 1902 is an AU with somewhat glossy surfaces that are completely consistent with a previously cleaned and/or polished coin.&nbsp; It also has some bad scratches under the shield on the reverse.&nbsp; The 1904 may be okay.&nbsp; The 1906 shows hairlines in the fields especially in front of the portrait along with some residue, gunk, corrosion or other &quot;stuff&quot; in the lower lying areas of the devices on the obverse.&nbsp; This coin is also AU.&nbsp; The reverse is showing some telltale color that it has been cleaned and/or polished with a sulfur agent.&nbsp; The 1907 shows hairlines, is a lower end AU and has a complete lack of natural surfaces.&nbsp; This coin was worked on pretty hard.&nbsp; The 1908 has truly been abused worse than the others.&nbsp; It is far too glossy, has circulated fairly well and has no natural color at all.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Please take the comments as they are meant; directed at the <i>coins </i> and not at you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in