Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
geekpryde's "Box of 100" CAC Type Set
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 25720642, member: 36248"]New purchase today, *possible* addition to the Type Set.</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS doesn't make the Jefferson "Reverse of 40" Type its own numbered Type, (probably too minor), but they do artificially break at 1964 for no good reason. I think Type 1 should be 2 years only (1938-1939), and then Type 2 would be 1939-2003, Type 3 would be War Nickels, but hey, who am I?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1643732[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Other companies like CACG consider the "Reverse of 38" and "Reverse of 40" two distinct types. I am not sure I should include it for my set, perhaps PCGS is correct and its too minor overall, even if they can be clearly distinguished, <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/jefferson-nickels-reverse-of-38-vs-reverse-of-40.207768/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/jefferson-nickels-reverse-of-38-vs-reverse-of-40.207768/">as show in this thread on CoinTalk</a>. For now, I will inspect the coin when it arrives and ponder it some more. I specifically wanted a Full Steps coin, as that area of the coin is one of the major changes done for 1940, even though in the 50s the strikes were generally bad for Jeffersons, and sort of undid some of the reasons behind the "Reverse of 40" changes.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1643730[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1643731[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 25720642, member: 36248"]New purchase today, *possible* addition to the Type Set. PCGS doesn't make the Jefferson "Reverse of 40" Type its own numbered Type, (probably too minor), but they do artificially break at 1964 for no good reason. I think Type 1 should be 2 years only (1938-1939), and then Type 2 would be 1939-2003, Type 3 would be War Nickels, but hey, who am I? [ATTACH=full]1643732[/ATTACH] Other companies like CACG consider the "Reverse of 38" and "Reverse of 40" two distinct types. I am not sure I should include it for my set, perhaps PCGS is correct and its too minor overall, even if they can be clearly distinguished, [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/jefferson-nickels-reverse-of-38-vs-reverse-of-40.207768/']as show in this thread on CoinTalk[/URL]. For now, I will inspect the coin when it arrives and ponder it some more. I specifically wanted a Full Steps coin, as that area of the coin is one of the major changes done for 1940, even though in the 50s the strikes were generally bad for Jeffersons, and sort of undid some of the reasons behind the "Reverse of 40" changes. [ATTACH=full]1643730[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1643731[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
geekpryde's "Box of 100" CAC Type Set
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...