Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MIGuy, post: 25205191, member: 116145&quot;]That isn&#039;t always true, though it usually is.&nbsp; This is because the most widely circulated example of the &quot;What the 1916 SLQ should look like&quot; picture in poor (dateless) condition doesn&#039;t have them - but examples of 1916s with similar rivet strength in low grade are out there. <a href="https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-coins/market-analysis-1916-standing-liberty-quarter" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-coins/market-analysis-1916-standing-liberty-quarter" rel="nofollow">https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-coins/market-analysis-1916-standing-liberty-quarter</a>&nbsp; That said, this rivet pattern is more common on the 1917 type 1 in poor shape and the drape doesn&#039;t look like it&#039;s touching the ankle.&nbsp; Insider has shown the pattern under the arm (&quot;W&quot;) that is one of the key tells of the 1916 vs 1917, but I&#039;m not sure on this one - I&#039;m leaning toward a type 1, 1917, but you might want to send it in to ICG on the CoinTalk special if you&#039;re really curious - spend some time comparing it to other examples and looking at it under the magnifier - that&#039;s what I did anyway.&nbsp; Good luck!&nbsp; For $10 you&#039;re good either way.&nbsp; Congrats![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in