Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pickin and Grinin, post: 3559255, member: 73995&quot;]Without seeing the graded example in hand. I would disagree with the designation. The steps should be separated as already said. There can be small nicks and ticks in the steps but cannot be deep enough to join them.</p><p>64 is one of the hardest Nickels in the series to get fully struck.&nbsp; And In fact 6FS is non existent.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyways it seems that because of the difficulty they gave the previously sold coin a pass. Instead of following there standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>I completely agree that the FS designation should be attached to a coin no matter the grade. But FS is a designation for only MS examples.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=100439]@Puddin'Farts[/USER] your nickel is very nice and has some very nice looking steps for the year. I&#039;d be happy with it if I were you. Is the 5th step full under the third pillar? It looks weak also the nicks in-between the first two pillars have joined the steps.</p><p>Not sure but the long gouge in the center could be a strike through. It is hard to see if there has been displaced metal.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in