Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Fugio1 2020 top 10
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Fugio1, post: 5281025, member: 89970"]This is my first top 10 posting. For me, 2020 was a good year for numismatics. Historically I may buy 5-6 coins a year, so narrowing to my favorite 10 coins in a year would be easy. This year, I acquired a few more, so I actually have a problem deciding my favorite 10. This is a good problem to have.</p><p><br /></p><p>For those of you who don’t know me, I’m a retired software engineer for Kodak where I worked for 45 years. I developed and supported manufacturing applications. I’ve collected coins relatively continuously since I was 10 years old with a short break for a few years of teenage insanity. I’ve actively collected and disposed of small collections of high grade US and British coins and I love all numismatics but my budget and my brain are not big enough to actively collect everything. In 1978, I bought my first ancient coin, a Roman Republican denarius from Tom McKenna, along with a copy of Seaby’s Roman Silver Coins volume 1, both of which I still own. I’ve always been fascinated by older stuff and became very interested in the origins of the denarius. These early coins of the denarius system form my principle collecting focus. About 10 years ago, I collaborated with Pierluigi Debernardi to create a website guide to the attribution of the fully anonymous denarii which can be found at this link:</p><p><a href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/index.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/index.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Here are my favorite 10 of 2020, and some reasons why I chose to acquire these specific coins. I have shared most of these, if not all before, but putting this list together was fun. These are listed in order of their acquisition this year.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#1. Quinarius, “H” series, RRC 85/1; 2.24 gms.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221093[/ATTACH]</p><p>Acquired from Gorney & Mosch , January 17, 2020</p><p>Ex Gerhard Hirsch Sept 25, 2019 lot 2555</p><p><br /></p><p>I was actually an underbidder on this coin in the Hirsch sale the previous September, and ended up buying it for nearly double the hammer price (but without buyer’s fee) when I found it at the G&M table at the NYI. This quinarius issue comes in two flavors: one with the H under the horses, and one with the H behind the horse’s legs, an example of which I do not have. The meaning of the “H”, whether it is a moneyer’s mark or a mint mark, is unknown. The H quinarius is common, though early coins of the denarius system in high grade are generally uncommon. The H denarius on the other hand, is a great rarity, apparently unknown to Crawford, but a few have come up in recent years. My hopes of ever owning a denarius of this type are slim to none.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#2 Corinthian Stater – Calciati 455/1, Pegasi 457, 8.55 gm.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221094[/ATTACH]</p><p>Acquired from Gorney & Mosch, January 2020</p><p>Ex Gerhard Hirsch May 8, 2019, lot 368</p><p><br /></p><p>I’m a casual collector of Greek coins. I have very few examples in my collection. On the first day of the New York International, I saw this coin at the G&M table where I bought the H quinarius (#1 above). Later in the evening, it appeared to me when I closed my eyes – It really spoke to me. The next morning first in the door, I walked directly to the G&M table and acquired it after minimal negotiation.</p><p><br /></p><p>Though these staters of Corinth are among the most common and available issues in ancient Greek coinage today, finding one with good style, in high grade, and at the right price can be challenging. Two out of three isn’t bad in this case.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#3 Q. Pomponius Musa, Urania - RRC 410/8, 4.09 g.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221101[/ATTACH]</p><p>Acquired from Herb Kreindler at NYI, 2020</p><p>Ex Roma Auction 18, 9/29/2019</p><p>Ex CNG Triton XXII January 2019 lot 882</p><p>Ex Alan J Harlan Collection, privately purchased from A.H. Baldwin & Sons LTD.</p><p><br /></p><p>Herb Kreindler had relatively few coins at his table at the NYI, but I was struck by the remarkably high quality and beautiful examples that were in his display case. The beauty of this coin jumped out at me, but the price was more than I had ever spent on a coin. My decision to buy was one of the best decisions I made all year.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#4 Anonymous denarius, Crawford 53/2, Group 9 (RRC plate X.20)</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1221104[/ATTACH] </b></p><p>Acquired from Lucernae, Feb 26, 2020</p><p>Ex Leu Numismatik Auction 2, May 11, 2018,</p><p>Ex CNG Triton XXII, January 8, 2019</p><p>Ex Roma Numismatics, Auction 18, September 29, 2019</p><p><br /></p><p>This is an example of the latest sub-group of the early fully anonymous peaked visor denarii classified by Crawford as 53/2. This sub-group is probably dated to the end of, or shortly after the close of the 2nd Punic War. This variety has eluded me in spite of it being perhaps the 2nd most common sub-group (following group 4 with flag capes). This appeared to me to be one of the finest examples I had seen, plus, the style is prototypical of most examples seen of this variety, so I thought it appropriate for my principal collecting theme of early Roman Denarii.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#5 Maximianus Follis – QVIES Reverse. RIC 788 (Trier)</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1221107[/ATTACH] </b></p><p>Ex HD Rauch auction 29-Feb-2020</p><p>Ex Numismatik Lanz Auction 100, Nov 20, 2000, lot 464</p><p><br /></p><p>A couple of years ago, I decided to expand my relatively narrow Early Roman Republican silver focus to include later Roman Republican coins and also, Roman Imperial coins of the post reform tetrarchy up to the sole reign of Constantine in 313 AD. Specifically, I look for interesting and scarcer types. I like the folles of Trier. They are generally of excellent style and this example is no exception. The QVIES type is explicitly a retirement type. Although there is no "S[enior] AVG" in the legend, it is believed this coin was probably struck after the Carnuntum conference in 308 when Maximian was retired for the second time. The image suggests substantial remaining silvering but in fact there is only a trace, mostly on the obverse, but the dies were so fresh that the fields on both sides are highly reflective.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#6 Maxentius Follis, Wolf and Twins reverse RIC 52 (Ostia)</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1221111[/ATTACH] </b></p><p>CNG eSale 465, Lot 529</p><p><br /></p><p>Another interesting type, one of the scarcer of the many scarce and rare types of Maxentius. The plates in RIC VI are generally reserved for the types not often seen. This is one of those types pictured in plate VII.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#7. L Manlivs Torquatus and Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Denarius, 82 BC, 4.00 gm.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221115[/ATTACH]</p><p>Nomisma Spa, eLive Sale 16, June 3, 2020</p><p><br /></p><p>Earlier this year, I read Colleen McCullough’s “First man in Rome” on the recommendation of a friend. Though it is a work of historical fiction, the actual events and characters are laid out in a way that re-introduced the story of the rise of Sulla. I was sufficiently sensitized when this coin emerged in the Nomisma sale. This issue is by far the most common of Sulla’s issues but the early die state, Interesting atypical obverse style, and stunning natural toning on this coin drew me to bid strongly in this Nomisma Sale.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#8. L. Farsuleius Mensor. Denarius 76 BC, RRC 392/1b</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221116[/ATTACH]</p><p>Bertolami Auction 92, lot 871</p><p><br /></p><p>Mensor is not known in History except for some speculation, so not a historically significant issue, but the obverse has an attractively rendered bust of Libertas, with SC behind indicating the issue was struck for a specific purpose directed by the senate. This issue is often found in nice condition. Though not a perfect example, the striking weakness on the shoulder of Libertas was hardly noticeable to me and the hammer price was reasonable.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#9. L. Furius Cn. F. Brocchus, Denarius, RRC 414/1</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221117[/ATTACH]</p><p>From the collection of Andrew McCabe, Roma Numismatics Auction XX, Lot 433, Oct. 29, 2020</p><p>Ex NAC auction 106, lot 438</p><p><br /></p><p>I had a half dozen coins on my watch list for the Roma Auction XX, but decided this was the one I wanted. The obverse head of Ceres is of charming style, and near perfect natural toning made my decision easy. The detail on the reverse curule chair and fasces is very unusual. The hammer price was well below my maximum for this so for me it was a bargain. Brocchus is unknown in history but his coins are plentiful. I venture that they are not plentiful in this condition.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>#10. TAMP series denarius, RRC 133/2b, 194-190 BC. 3.70 gms.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1221119[/ATTACH]</p><p>Bertolami Auction 87, lot 224</p><p><br /></p><p>Wrapping up the year I returned to the area of my truest passions, the origins and development of the denarius system in the late 3rd/early 2nd Century. Bertolami 87 was a remarkable sale of RR coins with several early Roman rarities, many smashing hammer price records for their types. The TAMP series, (as well as the closely related LPLH and AV series) has eluded me. These coins are not rare, but they are very scarce in high grade. I know I paid the right price because I pre-bid my maximum and live bidding went to that level and no further.</p><p><br /></p><p>A dreadful year for almost everything else has turned out great for my collection. Share any context you can add or mistakes that I have made.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Fugio1, post: 5281025, member: 89970"]This is my first top 10 posting. For me, 2020 was a good year for numismatics. Historically I may buy 5-6 coins a year, so narrowing to my favorite 10 coins in a year would be easy. This year, I acquired a few more, so I actually have a problem deciding my favorite 10. This is a good problem to have. For those of you who don’t know me, I’m a retired software engineer for Kodak where I worked for 45 years. I developed and supported manufacturing applications. I’ve collected coins relatively continuously since I was 10 years old with a short break for a few years of teenage insanity. I’ve actively collected and disposed of small collections of high grade US and British coins and I love all numismatics but my budget and my brain are not big enough to actively collect everything. In 1978, I bought my first ancient coin, a Roman Republican denarius from Tom McKenna, along with a copy of Seaby’s Roman Silver Coins volume 1, both of which I still own. I’ve always been fascinated by older stuff and became very interested in the origins of the denarius. These early coins of the denarius system form my principle collecting focus. About 10 years ago, I collaborated with Pierluigi Debernardi to create a website guide to the attribution of the fully anonymous denarii which can be found at this link: [URL]http://stevebrinkman.ancients.info/anonymous/index.html[/URL] Here are my favorite 10 of 2020, and some reasons why I chose to acquire these specific coins. I have shared most of these, if not all before, but putting this list together was fun. These are listed in order of their acquisition this year. [B]#1. Quinarius, “H” series, RRC 85/1; 2.24 gms.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221093[/ATTACH] Acquired from Gorney & Mosch , January 17, 2020 Ex Gerhard Hirsch Sept 25, 2019 lot 2555 I was actually an underbidder on this coin in the Hirsch sale the previous September, and ended up buying it for nearly double the hammer price (but without buyer’s fee) when I found it at the G&M table at the NYI. This quinarius issue comes in two flavors: one with the H under the horses, and one with the H behind the horse’s legs, an example of which I do not have. The meaning of the “H”, whether it is a moneyer’s mark or a mint mark, is unknown. The H quinarius is common, though early coins of the denarius system in high grade are generally uncommon. The H denarius on the other hand, is a great rarity, apparently unknown to Crawford, but a few have come up in recent years. My hopes of ever owning a denarius of this type are slim to none. [B]#2 Corinthian Stater – Calciati 455/1, Pegasi 457, 8.55 gm.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221094[/ATTACH] Acquired from Gorney & Mosch, January 2020 Ex Gerhard Hirsch May 8, 2019, lot 368 I’m a casual collector of Greek coins. I have very few examples in my collection. On the first day of the New York International, I saw this coin at the G&M table where I bought the H quinarius (#1 above). Later in the evening, it appeared to me when I closed my eyes – It really spoke to me. The next morning first in the door, I walked directly to the G&M table and acquired it after minimal negotiation. Though these staters of Corinth are among the most common and available issues in ancient Greek coinage today, finding one with good style, in high grade, and at the right price can be challenging. Two out of three isn’t bad in this case. [B]#3 Q. Pomponius Musa, Urania - RRC 410/8, 4.09 g.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221101[/ATTACH] Acquired from Herb Kreindler at NYI, 2020 Ex Roma Auction 18, 9/29/2019 Ex CNG Triton XXII January 2019 lot 882 Ex Alan J Harlan Collection, privately purchased from A.H. Baldwin & Sons LTD. Herb Kreindler had relatively few coins at his table at the NYI, but I was struck by the remarkably high quality and beautiful examples that were in his display case. The beauty of this coin jumped out at me, but the price was more than I had ever spent on a coin. My decision to buy was one of the best decisions I made all year. [B]#4 Anonymous denarius, Crawford 53/2, Group 9 (RRC plate X.20) [ATTACH=full]1221104[/ATTACH] [/B] Acquired from Lucernae, Feb 26, 2020 Ex Leu Numismatik Auction 2, May 11, 2018, Ex CNG Triton XXII, January 8, 2019 Ex Roma Numismatics, Auction 18, September 29, 2019 This is an example of the latest sub-group of the early fully anonymous peaked visor denarii classified by Crawford as 53/2. This sub-group is probably dated to the end of, or shortly after the close of the 2nd Punic War. This variety has eluded me in spite of it being perhaps the 2nd most common sub-group (following group 4 with flag capes). This appeared to me to be one of the finest examples I had seen, plus, the style is prototypical of most examples seen of this variety, so I thought it appropriate for my principal collecting theme of early Roman Denarii. [B]#5 Maximianus Follis – QVIES Reverse. RIC 788 (Trier) [ATTACH=full]1221107[/ATTACH] [/B] Ex HD Rauch auction 29-Feb-2020 Ex Numismatik Lanz Auction 100, Nov 20, 2000, lot 464 A couple of years ago, I decided to expand my relatively narrow Early Roman Republican silver focus to include later Roman Republican coins and also, Roman Imperial coins of the post reform tetrarchy up to the sole reign of Constantine in 313 AD. Specifically, I look for interesting and scarcer types. I like the folles of Trier. They are generally of excellent style and this example is no exception. The QVIES type is explicitly a retirement type. Although there is no "S[enior] AVG" in the legend, it is believed this coin was probably struck after the Carnuntum conference in 308 when Maximian was retired for the second time. The image suggests substantial remaining silvering but in fact there is only a trace, mostly on the obverse, but the dies were so fresh that the fields on both sides are highly reflective. [B]#6 Maxentius Follis, Wolf and Twins reverse RIC 52 (Ostia) [ATTACH=full]1221111[/ATTACH] [/B] CNG eSale 465, Lot 529 Another interesting type, one of the scarcer of the many scarce and rare types of Maxentius. The plates in RIC VI are generally reserved for the types not often seen. This is one of those types pictured in plate VII. [B]#7. L Manlivs Torquatus and Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Denarius, 82 BC, 4.00 gm.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221115[/ATTACH] Nomisma Spa, eLive Sale 16, June 3, 2020 Earlier this year, I read Colleen McCullough’s “First man in Rome” on the recommendation of a friend. Though it is a work of historical fiction, the actual events and characters are laid out in a way that re-introduced the story of the rise of Sulla. I was sufficiently sensitized when this coin emerged in the Nomisma sale. This issue is by far the most common of Sulla’s issues but the early die state, Interesting atypical obverse style, and stunning natural toning on this coin drew me to bid strongly in this Nomisma Sale. [B]#8. L. Farsuleius Mensor. Denarius 76 BC, RRC 392/1b[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221116[/ATTACH] Bertolami Auction 92, lot 871 Mensor is not known in History except for some speculation, so not a historically significant issue, but the obverse has an attractively rendered bust of Libertas, with SC behind indicating the issue was struck for a specific purpose directed by the senate. This issue is often found in nice condition. Though not a perfect example, the striking weakness on the shoulder of Libertas was hardly noticeable to me and the hammer price was reasonable. [B]#9. L. Furius Cn. F. Brocchus, Denarius, RRC 414/1[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221117[/ATTACH] From the collection of Andrew McCabe, Roma Numismatics Auction XX, Lot 433, Oct. 29, 2020 Ex NAC auction 106, lot 438 I had a half dozen coins on my watch list for the Roma Auction XX, but decided this was the one I wanted. The obverse head of Ceres is of charming style, and near perfect natural toning made my decision easy. The detail on the reverse curule chair and fasces is very unusual. The hammer price was well below my maximum for this so for me it was a bargain. Brocchus is unknown in history but his coins are plentiful. I venture that they are not plentiful in this condition. [B]#10. TAMP series denarius, RRC 133/2b, 194-190 BC. 3.70 gms.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1221119[/ATTACH] Bertolami Auction 87, lot 224 Wrapping up the year I returned to the area of my truest passions, the origins and development of the denarius system in the late 3rd/early 2nd Century. Bertolami 87 was a remarkable sale of RR coins with several early Roman rarities, many smashing hammer price records for their types. The TAMP series, (as well as the closely related LPLH and AV series) has eluded me. These coins are not rare, but they are very scarce in high grade. I know I paid the right price because I pre-bid my maximum and live bidding went to that level and no further. A dreadful year for almost everything else has turned out great for my collection. Share any context you can add or mistakes that I have made.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Fugio1 2020 top 10
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...