Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ian, post: 22325, member: 283&quot;]I thought that was what you meant but took the soft option <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Bear in mind that Henry (Earl of Northumberland and Huntingdon) died before his father and as such never succeeded to the Scottish throne. As such all of Henry&#039;s coinage was struck in England for use in England.</p><p><br /></p><p>They are classed as Scottish basically because at that time Northumberland was to all intents and purposes `Scottish&#039;, and Henry was Scottish. </p><p><br /></p><p>The coinage circulated alongside that of David I and were struck at Carlisle, Corbridge and (according to Mark Davidson) possibly Bamborough.</p><p><br /></p><p>I suspect that is why you will find some cataloguers listing them under `England&#039; and some under `Scotland&#039;.</p><p><br /></p><p>The issues are all aparently one and the same (politically / geographically speaking) although there were different type issues.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in