Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2476223, member: 24314&quot;]I&#039;m very interested in what members think about this situation?&nbsp; In the past both sets of lines were necessary on the bell and some Franklin &quot;purists&quot; even insisted that the wisp of hair on the obverse be distinct. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; While that would indicate a truly well struck Franklin, I could never understand what that had to do with the lines on the coin&#039;s reverse.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie30" alt=":bucktooth:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; I believe the &quot;purists&quot; have lost this battle.</p><p><br /></p><p>When things seemed settled, PCGS had to come along and screw with the standard to be able to grade more FBL coins.&nbsp; What say you?&nbsp; Just decided - New Poll.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in