Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Anntron, post: 5130796, member: 109580&quot;]It might be worth remembering during the period of Franklin production, all Hub &amp; Die work for all three Mints was exclusively implemented at the Philadelphia Mint Die Room. There are considerable evidence and antidotal data that suggests that the branch Mints were frequently treated like stepchildren and sent inferior or older equipment and supplies from the Philly Die Room.&nbsp; There are nuances to suggest intentional manipulation of die inventory distributed to the branch Mints to impair their ability to maintain quality control.&nbsp; Philadelphia exclusively punched mintmarks into every Working Die destined for the branch Mints. For the record, any aspersions to “sloppy” punching or poorly defined dies are a mark against the Philly Die Room’s quality control and not a reflection on the branch Mints. </p><p><br /></p><p>The lack of definition of Bell Line in San Francisco Mint Franklin halves is a result of low strike pressure, overused, and over-polished Working Dies.&nbsp; This is due to the assumption that the Working Dies we “perfect” when they left the Philly Mint.&nbsp; However, this was not the case.&nbsp; Inferior material was constantly being earmarked for the branch mints.&nbsp; This is proven by the numerous examples of Franklin Doubled Die varies that plagued the 1950-1952 Denver and San Francisco Mint Franklin Half dollars.&nbsp; Many of the Reverse Working Dies shipped to the branch mints from Philly did not have fully struck Bell Lines right off the Hubbing presses.&nbsp; The best Working Dies were “Cherry Picked” by the Philly mint with lesser quality Working Dies sent to the branch mints.</p><p><br /></p><p>More to the point, the San Francisco Mint was a “dumping ground” for outdated equipment, inferior resources, and insufficient fiscal support.&nbsp; During 1949 and 1950, excerpts from the “Report of the Director of the Mint” and correspondence shows minimal production support for the San Francisco Mint.&nbsp; At times, the Director of the Mint in Philadelphia openly chastised San Francisco Mint staff for developing innovative techniques to overcome deficiencies, die problems, planchet issues, and fiscal constraints. Remember, the Philly Mint was responsible to let local contracts for metals and supplies for the branch mints. Occasionally the suppliers shipped resources of dubious quality because the Philly Mint restricted budget allocations to the other mints.&nbsp; Ironically, some of the San Francisco Mint’s creative techniques to overcome these issues were eventually adopted by the other Mints. </p><p><br /></p><p>The quality and quantity of Franklin Half FBL specimens are more due to Philly Mint&#039;s ego and politics than shotty branch mint practices.&nbsp; The disparity by collectors and grading services as to what constitutes FBL is tangential to the cause of the lack of definition.&nbsp; Post-strike damage such as dings or scratches on the Bell lines rarely impact the true strike characteristic of a well-struck coin.&nbsp; However, these marks have evolved into the subjective interpretation of “value” if you “buy” into the premise.&nbsp; Chasing an FBL specimen and ignoring a superior struck example may not be prudent to future collectors.&nbsp; Strick quality, even with muted currently trending detail (FBL), will always hold value.&nbsp; For the true collector of Franklins, it is the “eye appeal” that eventually brings the value even with slightly inconsistent bell lines.&nbsp; Which would you rather have in your collection, a Bright White MS65 1953 – FBL Franklin or a Natural Rainbow toned MS67+ 1952-S Franklin?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in