Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;WillGK, post: 5011482, member: 115517&quot;]Lehigh96, exactly as I see it - MS66, MS66+, and a shot at MS67.&nbsp; No idea why the previous poster thought that it wasn’t even worth submitting.&nbsp; Also, it is a 52-P, not a 52-D as I stated in my original post, which makes it more valuable. My questions - luster and dings on reverse.&nbsp; Dings on reverse don’t concern me a lot, as obverse is super clean and I have read that PCGS cares more about obverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>Luster...&nbsp; This is my key question, other than FBL which you have answered, and I wish you would comment, as I have no experience at this stuff. I have quite a number of Franklins of very high quality, about like this.&nbsp; But many of them scream luster.&nbsp; This one doesn’t. If you had this coin in hand you would say that it has full mint luster - metal flow lines, cartwheel, no evidence of anything other than a soft, original, uniform, unbroken luster.&nbsp; The luster is better than the photos, but there is a uniform, light tan toning.&nbsp; But it doesn’t scream, it is soft.&nbsp; My question for you:&nbsp; If the luster is as good as it left the mint, of which I am convinced and believe PCGS will agree, is this good enough for a top grade?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in