Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NewStyleKing, post: 4791259, member: 106483&quot;]Seemed familiar to me.....</p><p><br /></p><p>Meadows &amp; Houghton: THE GAZIANTEP HOARD&nbsp; 1994 CH X on academia.edu-no plates though!</p><p><br /></p><p>Imitative Issue &lt; and HERM; &gt; A199* 17.08g CNG 30, 11 Jun 1994, 123. See controls of Issue 12 and imitative issue, Thompson 1349 (both without herm).</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin has an amazing modern history so you must go onto academia.edu, look up Andrew Meadows and find the above paper</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1164243[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Other thoughts. The low chronology of the New Styles should be used since Thompson,herself, gave up her High Chronology c 1984 for the Lewis Low chronology, which was championed by Mattingly and later by Meadows and nearly all modern NewStylists and me! And is used by PeteB above for his Caps of Pilloi NewStyle.</p><p><br /></p><p>Top, Winged Caduceus c 133/2 BC</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Elephant 131/0 BC&nbsp; The Antiochus reference is not now related to any Seleucid Prince-Boehringer,Habicht and then Mattingly gave up the idea followed later by DeCallatay,Morkholm,Houghton,Meadows and me!</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Imitation c 150 BC will do fine!</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Triptolemus c 113/12 you gave is the modern low chronology date.</p><p><br /></p><p>Although the modern low chronology has been adopted since NSSCA 1961 the general sequencing of Thompson has had only a few changes since then.</p><p><br /></p><p>I, Myself, am notorious for my almost single minded love of the New Styles having 55 officials and 3 imitations and 1 pseudo Athenian. Only total of 50 in this old photo though.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1164257[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in