Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Hommer, post: 2790837, member: 73266&quot;]I don&#039;t know why I&#039;m even going to the trouble to type this, and I wish that the OP would put the photos back up, but I saw the photos and for a while had them up on a second computer screen. The reason that I kept them as long as I did was that the mint mark on this coin was very similar to any RPM you could compare it to. It has a very good case for argument here because of the evidence of the crater effect around the mint mark, which only comes from the mint mark being punched into the die. I&#039;m not trying to be an advocate for anyone here, except maybe myself, as I have a 1992 nickel somewhere that also shows the crater effect and slight misalignment of the mint mark, which has always led me to believe that in the early stages of the mint changing the way that the mint marks were punched, some trading of dies between Philadelphia and Denver took place. I found reference to such once in the mint archives but haven&#039;t had the time to find it again.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in