Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Oldhoopster, post: 2693473, member: 84179&quot;]I think the 2 might be OK.&nbsp; I always thought the original punch for the 2 didn&#039;t fit the coin but that&#039;s the design.&nbsp; It was fixed in 1942. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m more concerned with the mm.&nbsp; 1932-D and S used to be counterfeited quite extensively by adding a mm.&nbsp; This was done by soldering a mm onto the back.&nbsp; One of the signs was darkness around the mm.&nbsp; On many, you can see solder at high magnification.&nbsp; There may be diagnostics as to the correct S for 1932 versus others from the 40&#039;s and 50&#039;s but I don&#039;t know them (read: to lazy to look them up).&nbsp; The comparison pic that rickmp posted, seems to show a diff style of mm for the OPs coin vs genuine.&nbsp; Assuming there is only 1 mm style for 32-S, I would dig into that area.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in