Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MIGuy, post: 5143354, member: 116145&quot;]That&#039;s ludicrous and offensive, as I believe was clear from my posting, I was excited because it looked like a 1916 to me - especially as to the drape of the dress / foot and the line on the left under Liberty&#039;s right arm.&nbsp; I didn&#039;t have much confidence in my ability to discern these things because I&#039;ve only seen 1916s online in pictures, and it seemed so implausible that I would happen upon one, when there are so many folks out there who have a real eye for these things, unlike me.&nbsp; I was willing to pay for ICG to take a look because of my suspicions - and it turned out I was right.</p><p><br /></p><p>Please don&#039;t be petty, rude and / or jealous, my intention was not to gloat, and if it came across that way I apologize, I am just excited.&nbsp; I think anyone would be.&nbsp; Posts like yours make people sorry to share their successes.&nbsp; I like to celebrate other people&#039;s successes in general.&nbsp; Again, you&#039;re welcome to put your money where your mouth is - I&#039;d be happy to submit my entire and complete (fine, I don&#039;t have the 17/18 overstrike, lol) SLQ set to PCGS and CAC on your dime if you think it&#039;s important to assess the veracity of the ICG graders.&nbsp; My understanding is that the 1916 would probably be worth an extra $500 in a PCGS case with a CAC sticker.&nbsp;&nbsp; I may eventually do that myself if I have the extra money and can figure out the PCGS submission process, but for now I&#039;m not really worried about value, I am just excited to have a complete set - 2 1/2 years in the works.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in