Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Fortin Attribution
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="samclemens3991, post: 13514527, member: 82181"]UPDATE I am afraid that our attempts to get pictures of the coin were a complete fail. (It did not help matters that my daughter Allison dropped her phone during the blizzard and then proceeded to run the poor thing over with her car).</p><p>We used shipping tape to put the thing back together. On the one hand it is surprising it works, however the tape seems to have made all the pictures blurry. I spent some time this morning trying to adjust photos but no luck.</p><p>On the other hand, while trapped in a hotel room for a few days awhile back I made a discovery. (The room had a desk with a lamp that must have been 1000 watts.) Lucky for me I had coin and loupe along since I knew I would have hours of dead time. </p><p>The coin DOES HAVE clash marks on the reverse. That was the only point holding it back from being identified as a Fortin 105. I can only assume the obverse clash marks must be some version of 105 and perhaps they were lapped off on later coins. Maybe right , maybe wrong, but at least I can log it in my journal with an asterisk. James[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="samclemens3991, post: 13514527, member: 82181"]UPDATE I am afraid that our attempts to get pictures of the coin were a complete fail. (It did not help matters that my daughter Allison dropped her phone during the blizzard and then proceeded to run the poor thing over with her car). We used shipping tape to put the thing back together. On the one hand it is surprising it works, however the tape seems to have made all the pictures blurry. I spent some time this morning trying to adjust photos but no luck. On the other hand, while trapped in a hotel room for a few days awhile back I made a discovery. (The room had a desk with a lamp that must have been 1000 watts.) Lucky for me I had coin and loupe along since I knew I would have hours of dead time. The coin DOES HAVE clash marks on the reverse. That was the only point holding it back from being identified as a Fortin 105. I can only assume the obverse clash marks must be some version of 105 and perhaps they were lapped off on later coins. Maybe right , maybe wrong, but at least I can log it in my journal with an asterisk. James[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Fortin Attribution
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...