Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Florida Restaurant Implements No-Coin Policy
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Hobo, post: 1075031, member: 11521"]Thank you for not lecturing me. I am very well-versed in math. I took numerous math courses in college (more than I can count over 30 years later). I have two engineering degrees and math is a huge part of engineering. I had considered becoming a math major before settling on engineering. I am not saying I am a math genius by any means but math has always come very easy to me and I enjoy doing math. I may not differentiate equations on a daily basis but I took and passed differential and intergral calculus, differential equations, and probability and statistics (as well many other higher level math courses). </p><p> </p><p>Perhaps instead of saying, "the lower your bill the greater the penalty, potentially" I should have said, "the lower your bill the greater the penalty <b>as a percentage of your total bill</b>, potentially". Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding caused by my less-than-perfect communication skills. </p><p> </p><p>But I will stand by my (clarified) statement, <font face="Times New Roman"><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">"the lower your bill the greater the penalty <b>as a percentage of your total bill</b>, potentially". I did not mean to imply anything other than what I wrote. Let me try to further clarify my statement: From a certain dollar amount as you move toward zero your <b>potential</b> penalty increases <b>as a percentage of your total bill</b>. </font></font></font></p><p> </p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font face="Verdana"><font size="2">I made no mention whatsoever about moving in the opposite direction (i.e., from a certain dollar amount as you move toward infinity). I believe you are the one that first mentioned that. If I may quote you:</font></font></font></p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>I agree with that statement, however that was not my point. <b><u>My</u></b> point was the opposite; (to say it another way) as the bill gets smaller the potential "penalty" remains at a number less than $1.00 that gets increasingly significant (as a percentage of the total bill) as you approach zero. (A 98.02% penalty on a bill of $1.01 is significant in my book. If penny candy still existed I would think a 9,900% penalty on a one-cent purchase is significant.) </p><p> </p><p>I think I have now made my thoughts perfectly clear and I am finished with this discussion with you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Hobo, post: 1075031, member: 11521"]Thank you for not lecturing me. I am very well-versed in math. I took numerous math courses in college (more than I can count over 30 years later). I have two engineering degrees and math is a huge part of engineering. I had considered becoming a math major before settling on engineering. I am not saying I am a math genius by any means but math has always come very easy to me and I enjoy doing math. I may not differentiate equations on a daily basis but I took and passed differential and intergral calculus, differential equations, and probability and statistics (as well many other higher level math courses). Perhaps instead of saying, "the lower your bill the greater the penalty, potentially" I should have said, "the lower your bill the greater the penalty [B]as a percentage of your total bill[/B], potentially". Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding caused by my less-than-perfect communication skills. But I will stand by my (clarified) statement, [FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2]"the lower your bill the greater the penalty [B]as a percentage of your total bill[/B], potentially". I did not mean to imply anything other than what I wrote. Let me try to further clarify my statement: From a certain dollar amount as you move toward zero your [B]potential[/B] penalty increases [B]as a percentage of your total bill[/B]. [/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2]I made no mention whatsoever about moving in the opposite direction (i.e., from a certain dollar amount as you move toward infinity). I believe you are the one that first mentioned that. If I may quote you:[/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT] I agree with that statement, however that was not my point. [B][U]My[/U][/B] point was the opposite; (to say it another way) as the bill gets smaller the potential "penalty" remains at a number less than $1.00 that gets increasingly significant (as a percentage of the total bill) as you approach zero. (A 98.02% penalty on a bill of $1.01 is significant in my book. If penny candy still existed I would think a 9,900% penalty on a one-cent purchase is significant.) I think I have now made my thoughts perfectly clear and I am finished with this discussion with you.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Florida Restaurant Implements No-Coin Policy
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...