Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Florida Restaurant Implements No-Coin Policy
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cubenewb, post: 1074997, member: 25644"]I'm not so sure you understand what I said. Affixing "potential" to your estimation that the "lower your bill the greater the penalty" does not in anyway rationalize that statement.</p><p> I do realize that you took this 'penalty' and made it a percentage of the total bill, of which I said:</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Consider the penalty as X. Consider the total bill (with sales Tax) as Y. You are saying</p><p><br /></p><p>[(X)/(Y) ]*100 = Penalty Percentage</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm trying to say that this "penalty percentage" is extremely misleading, based on the following facts:</p><p>0<x<1</p><p>Y --> Infinity</p><p><br /></p><p>So you're basically asserting that dividing a number that is in some senses finite (because it is bounded by 0 and 1) by a number that gets large without bound yields a lower penalty. Hobo, this is as simple as saying:</p><p><br /></p><p>1/(Something that's getting bigger) = Something that's getting smaller</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I just don't think that's the best way to demonstrate what's going on here; by attaching an ever-increasing value to the relatively fixed penalty rate, you are essentially muddling the significance of the cycle itself. As the bill goes up, this "penalty percentage" that you created does indeed go down, but that's only because the penalty percentage involves dividing by the very number that is getting larger!</p><p><br /></p><p>Back to your original statement: "the lower your bill the greater the penalty, potentially" ; if by penalty you mean your 'penalty percentage' then yes, you are indeed correct! However, I think using that as an indicator of the 'penalty' might be right only in your own mind (after all, you are a legend there <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> )</p><p><br /></p><p>I hope you see where I'm coming from; I see what you are saying but I do not think that is the way you should go about it. Can you see what I'm trying to say?</p><p><br /></p><p>P.S. The equations I set up are merely a way I can articulate what I believe you are saying. I am not lecturing you there, just trying to demonstrate my contentions more clearly.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cubenewb, post: 1074997, member: 25644"]I'm not so sure you understand what I said. Affixing "potential" to your estimation that the "lower your bill the greater the penalty" does not in anyway rationalize that statement. I do realize that you took this 'penalty' and made it a percentage of the total bill, of which I said: Consider the penalty as X. Consider the total bill (with sales Tax) as Y. You are saying [(X)/(Y) ]*100 = Penalty Percentage I'm trying to say that this "penalty percentage" is extremely misleading, based on the following facts: 0<x<1 Y --> Infinity So you're basically asserting that dividing a number that is in some senses finite (because it is bounded by 0 and 1) by a number that gets large without bound yields a lower penalty. Hobo, this is as simple as saying: 1/(Something that's getting bigger) = Something that's getting smaller I just don't think that's the best way to demonstrate what's going on here; by attaching an ever-increasing value to the relatively fixed penalty rate, you are essentially muddling the significance of the cycle itself. As the bill goes up, this "penalty percentage" that you created does indeed go down, but that's only because the penalty percentage involves dividing by the very number that is getting larger! Back to your original statement: "the lower your bill the greater the penalty, potentially" ; if by penalty you mean your 'penalty percentage' then yes, you are indeed correct! However, I think using that as an indicator of the 'penalty' might be right only in your own mind (after all, you are a legend there ;) ) I hope you see where I'm coming from; I see what you are saying but I do not think that is the way you should go about it. Can you see what I'm trying to say? P.S. The equations I set up are merely a way I can articulate what I believe you are saying. I am not lecturing you there, just trying to demonstrate my contentions more clearly.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Florida Restaurant Implements No-Coin Policy
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...