Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Parthicus, post: 2663954, member: 81887&quot;]Okay, that makes sense.&nbsp; I was using my trusty older copy of RIC, which is the 1968 reprint, which I think does not make any substantive changes to the original text of 1926 (for Volume II).&nbsp; Most of the time that&#039;s not a problem, but it&#039;s only natural that subsequent research has changed our understanding of some aspects of the coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=82616]@David Atherton[/USER]: Are the changes to RIC (specifically the Flavian section) sufficient in the newer edition to justify upgrading my library?&nbsp; I&#039;m not planning on becoming a Flavian specialist, but I do like to have up-to-date information.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in