Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Lemme Caution, post: 2904839, member: 90575"]I think what Fallguy is alluding to is that this is the second, almost identical 1975 "error cent" thread in a row initiated within just the last couple of days. The prior, original thread has been going on and on interminably with the OP basically reiterating and repeating the same points (pointlessness?) over and over again as a fairly exclusive venture with not much input from anyone else either offered and/or delivered. What we apparently have here now is yet another iteration of a rather sketchy-looking "mint error" as presented for our examination and/or edification. This time, however, it might in fact be becoming clear even more quickly than previously that this will be at least as much of a wild goose chase as the other has been all along. Perhaps this is a genuine post or perhaps we are being trolled, and since I don't claim to have any idea as to which way the wind is in point of fact really blowing here, it might be more than worthwhile for someone with superior personal knowledge of and experience with this particular line of inquiry to at least make an attempt at reaching some level of certainty as to what the facts actually might be. Thank you.[/QUOTE]