Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
First Year MS Sets: Question about Appreciation
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1217145, member: 66"]Well it's kind of hard to say. Exactly what do they mean by a first year of issue mint set? If I look at the US Mint sets, then yes they do appear to all be higher than issue price for those sets that had a first year of issue coin in it. But most of the increases over issue price are very small. The largest in the 1964 mint set, but it is way up mainly because of the silver content and even on that set its growth rate of 5% per annum is not much compared to the official 3% inflation rate. In other words over 57 years it has beaten inflation by $7</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1973 mint set, first one with the Ike dollar in it is up a little more than double. But the annual rate is 2% or a $9 loss to inflation. (How much higher the current price would have to be just to break even with inflation)</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1975 bicentennial set is up about 20% absolute, but that is about 1% per annum or a $14 loss to inflation</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1979 set with the SBA is still about at issue price so that's a $12 loss to inflation.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1999 -2003 sets are all selling at about issues price so those are inflation losses of from $3 to $5 to inflation</p><p><br /></p><p>The 2004 set is a winner with an 11% per annum return or $11 above inflation</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Probably, most govenment set go up for awhile right after the come out, and again right after the mint cuts off sales. The problem is usually within a few years the price starts to fall and usually within ten years they are back at issue price or less.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hmmm you said Mint sets but your comment about the ATB set makes me think you may be talking about the Proof sets. So proof sets for those same years.</p><p><br /></p><p>1964 4% per annum beat inflation by $8 but mainly for the silver.</p><p>1973 0% $13 loss to inflation</p><p>1975 1% $10 loss</p><p>1979 -1% $13 loss</p><p>1999 - 04 99 is a winner at 5% a $7 gain over inflation, 00 is a huge loser -6% per annum a $36 loss, 01 winner 14% per annum $45 gain, 02 3% $0 gain, 03 another big loser -6% $11 loss, 04 winner 6% $4 gain[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1217145, member: 66"]Well it's kind of hard to say. Exactly what do they mean by a first year of issue mint set? If I look at the US Mint sets, then yes they do appear to all be higher than issue price for those sets that had a first year of issue coin in it. But most of the increases over issue price are very small. The largest in the 1964 mint set, but it is way up mainly because of the silver content and even on that set its growth rate of 5% per annum is not much compared to the official 3% inflation rate. In other words over 57 years it has beaten inflation by $7 The 1973 mint set, first one with the Ike dollar in it is up a little more than double. But the annual rate is 2% or a $9 loss to inflation. (How much higher the current price would have to be just to break even with inflation) The 1975 bicentennial set is up about 20% absolute, but that is about 1% per annum or a $14 loss to inflation The 1979 set with the SBA is still about at issue price so that's a $12 loss to inflation. The 1999 -2003 sets are all selling at about issues price so those are inflation losses of from $3 to $5 to inflation The 2004 set is a winner with an 11% per annum return or $11 above inflation Probably, most govenment set go up for awhile right after the come out, and again right after the mint cuts off sales. The problem is usually within a few years the price starts to fall and usually within ten years they are back at issue price or less. Hmmm you said Mint sets but your comment about the ATB set makes me think you may be talking about the Proof sets. So proof sets for those same years. 1964 4% per annum beat inflation by $8 but mainly for the silver. 1973 0% $13 loss to inflation 1975 1% $10 loss 1979 -1% $13 loss 1999 - 04 99 is a winner at 5% a $7 gain over inflation, 00 is a huge loser -6% per annum a $36 loss, 01 winner 14% per annum $45 gain, 02 3% $0 gain, 03 another big loser -6% $11 loss, 04 winner 6% $4 gain[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
First Year MS Sets: Question about Appreciation
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...