Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2574549, member: 1892&quot;]As good as these images are, I feel comfortable offering a couple ideas for improvement since you&#039;ve no reason to feel either your skills or equipment are lacking. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Obviously, larger is better. I don&#039;t know if these are actual size, or downsized in order to post here, but the camera is plainly capable of capturing sharp images and it&#039;s rare that images this clear <i>have</i> to be this small. At a minimum, for grading purposes one tries to achieve a diameter of 800 pixels or more for the coin itself; I personally shoot for 1000-1200px in diameter. You can help this by cropping as close to the coin as possible, eliminating any extraneous image data that might be complicating whatever postprocessing program you&#039;re using.</p><p><br /></p><p>Which leads to the next question, which has already been asked. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> In addition, what are you using for postprocessing technique to present them here? I see you&#039;re using Elements for Mac, but there&#039;s no indication of how large the images are to start with nor what&#039;s been done to make them postable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in