Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
First owl
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24877446, member: 26430"]I'm not sure that it's necessarily an Eastern imitation. This is what the official Athenian ones look like from the "late Classical" period, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=pi+style+folded+flan" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=pi+style+folded+flan" rel="nofollow">c. 353-294 BCE ("pi-style palmette" types)</a>, rather than the "mass classical owls" struck about 100 years earlier (c. 454-404 BCE).</p><p><br /></p><p>They were struck on "folded flans." The best academic reference I know on these (quite readable though) is <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229" rel="nofollow">Kroll's (2011) "THE REMINTING OF ATHENIAN SILVER COINAGE, 353 B.C."</a> -- available on JSTOR if you have access or sign up for free with your email -- or <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229.pdf%3Fcasa_token%3D-aqrMRneLoYAAAAA:IfYLJPYdc6AIPnmQlyIJhqVPlnlZVttJUn-KlVzWKtbflyaJqaXj2IsBVY-LbjT7EQ8ilKDA7_nYKvlNzlXbgYl_wKjf--KFXHVc30CylZgW-Id4dw&hl=en&sa=T&oi=ucasa&ct=ucasa&ei=qLrJX8OrO5DWmgHq7L3gBA&scisig=AAGBfm159CbKrvm9cAiHRD9kVXfa75imKg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229.pdf%3Fcasa_token%3D-aqrMRneLoYAAAAA:IfYLJPYdc6AIPnmQlyIJhqVPlnlZVttJUn-KlVzWKtbflyaJqaXj2IsBVY-LbjT7EQ8ilKDA7_nYKvlNzlXbgYl_wKjf--KFXHVc30CylZgW-Id4dw&hl=en&sa=T&oi=ucasa&ct=ucasa&ei=qLrJX8OrO5DWmgHq7L3gBA&scisig=AAGBfm159CbKrvm9cAiHRD9kVXfa75imKg" rel="nofollow">downloadable as pdf here</a>. (Also, much of its substance is covered <a href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Pi-Style" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Pi-Style" rel="nofollow">here on FORVM's Numiswiki</a>, quoted directly in places, though not always adequately cited.)</p><p><br /></p><p>I think these ones below are all my current ones, in roughly chronological order (c. 454 - 84 BCE). As far as I know, only the two little ones (Drachm and Obol) are Eastern (Judaean/Philistian-Gazan) imitations.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1597090[/ATTACH]</p><p>(I should mention that I'm not 100% certain of the authenticity of the holed late-classical 3rd century one since it's clearly been heavily modified for modern jewelry.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24877446, member: 26430"]I'm not sure that it's necessarily an Eastern imitation. This is what the official Athenian ones look like from the "late Classical" period, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=pi+style+folded+flan']c. 353-294 BCE ("pi-style palmette" types)[/URL], rather than the "mass classical owls" struck about 100 years earlier (c. 454-404 BCE). They were struck on "folded flans." The best academic reference I know on these (quite readable though) is [URL='https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229']Kroll's (2011) "THE REMINTING OF ATHENIAN SILVER COINAGE, 353 B.C."[/URL] -- available on JSTOR if you have access or sign up for free with your email -- or [URL='https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.2972/hesperia.80.2.0229.pdf%3Fcasa_token%3D-aqrMRneLoYAAAAA:IfYLJPYdc6AIPnmQlyIJhqVPlnlZVttJUn-KlVzWKtbflyaJqaXj2IsBVY-LbjT7EQ8ilKDA7_nYKvlNzlXbgYl_wKjf--KFXHVc30CylZgW-Id4dw&hl=en&sa=T&oi=ucasa&ct=ucasa&ei=qLrJX8OrO5DWmgHq7L3gBA&scisig=AAGBfm159CbKrvm9cAiHRD9kVXfa75imKg']downloadable as pdf here[/URL]. (Also, much of its substance is covered [URL='https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Pi-Style']here on FORVM's Numiswiki[/URL], quoted directly in places, though not always adequately cited.) I think these ones below are all my current ones, in roughly chronological order (c. 454 - 84 BCE). As far as I know, only the two little ones (Drachm and Obol) are Eastern (Judaean/Philistian-Gazan) imitations. [ATTACH=full]1597090[/ATTACH] (I should mention that I'm not 100% certain of the authenticity of the holed late-classical 3rd century one since it's clearly been heavily modified for modern jewelry.)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
First owl
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...