Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;+VGO.DVCKS, post: 8192709, member: 110504&quot;]Very, Very impressive example, [USER=84065]@Edessa[/USER].&nbsp; This exact variant (&#039;+CARLVS REX R,&#039; with nothing in the reverse fields) corresponds to Nouchy p. 264: 33B.</p><p>Surprisingly, given Depeyrot&#039;s reputation, Nouchy is sometimes better, especially for the variant legends.&nbsp; Your example deserves a full citation:</p><p>Patrick Nouchy.&nbsp; <u>Le Rois Carolingiens de Francie Occidentale de Pepin le Bref a Louis V (751-987)</u>.&nbsp; Dreux: Editions du Grenier Durocasse, 1994.&nbsp; </p><p>Unlike Depeyrot, which is arranged by mint --similarly to references on feudal coins, back to Poey d&#039;Avant-- Nouchy is set up by reign, with each mint arranged alphabetically (right,over and over...).&nbsp; Maybe just a tad more user-friendly.&nbsp; He also has indices for mints, and even legends --for the times when it comes down to that.&nbsp; (Trust me, I&#039;ve been there!)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in