Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Finally, a Carolingian coin unambiguously attributable to Charles the Simple ...I hope
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="seth77, post: 8191550, member: 56653"]Well, as a matter of fact the later immobilizations are also from the famous Crusader 'nostra moneta' coinages -- coins taken by the crusaders towards the Holy Land in the First Crusade. So if one does not have access to research on the coinage of Poitou, there is another shot to be taken towards the research done on Crusader material, especially hoards. So in this case we have roughly speaking -- Fecamp (Francoise Dumas-Dubourg - Le tresor de Fecamp...) and the later Outremer hoards - Near East 2000 (I & W Schulze, Bompaire, et al - A coin hoard from the First Crusade...) and the ones noted by Metcalf (Some hoards and stray finds...) etc. as material. Teboulbi, Bompaire et al (Les monnayages d'Alphonse de Poitiers...) gives the bottom tail-end of the series at 400-430/1000 for the coinage of Richard for instance, but for the period of ca. 1000 to 1100 (so after Fecamp but before the 'nostra moneta' of the crusaders) I don't really know if there is research marking the evolution of billon quality.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="seth77, post: 8191550, member: 56653"]Well, as a matter of fact the later immobilizations are also from the famous Crusader 'nostra moneta' coinages -- coins taken by the crusaders towards the Holy Land in the First Crusade. So if one does not have access to research on the coinage of Poitou, there is another shot to be taken towards the research done on Crusader material, especially hoards. So in this case we have roughly speaking -- Fecamp (Francoise Dumas-Dubourg - Le tresor de Fecamp...) and the later Outremer hoards - Near East 2000 (I & W Schulze, Bompaire, et al - A coin hoard from the First Crusade...) and the ones noted by Metcalf (Some hoards and stray finds...) etc. as material. Teboulbi, Bompaire et al (Les monnayages d'Alphonse de Poitiers...) gives the bottom tail-end of the series at 400-430/1000 for the coinage of Richard for instance, but for the period of ca. 1000 to 1100 (so after Fecamp but before the 'nostra moneta' of the crusaders) I don't really know if there is research marking the evolution of billon quality.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Finally, a Carolingian coin unambiguously attributable to Charles the Simple ...I hope
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...