Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
FEV or not FEV: That is the question.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 1445012, member: 15929"]<font size="4"><font size="2">The 1971-D Eisenhower Dollar comes with two Reverse Design Varieties (RDV). </font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">RDV-001 is the common reverse</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">RDV-006 is the uncommon reverse. This reverse was first announced in late 1999 in CONECA's Errorscope Magazine (Nov/Dec 1999 Vol 8 No 6) a full 28 years <i>after</i> the coin was released. The discoverer was listed as Charles Cataldo. The description was, IMO, somewhat sketchy which is typical of Eisenhower Dollar Descriptions. If you recall, the initial description for the Type 2 Eisenhower Dollar was written to thwart even the heavily interested individuals. The RDV-006 was no different. One sentence in the report states: </font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">"The crater above the LA of DOLLAR has a thick area just left of center on the inside upper lip and thick clusters of flow lines in the center and right area of the crater rim." </font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">YIKES! </font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">The pictures provided were just as confusing as they compared the Type 1 (RDV-001), Type 3 (RDV-003), and the Type 6 (RDV-006). Including the Type 3 simply clouded the explanation IMO since the Type 3 reverse was not even available when the 1971 coins were being minted so it has absolutely no relevance.</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">In case you're curious, the numbers assigned to Design Varieties are assigned according to discovery, not when they were acutally employed. Since the RDV-006 had been identified, another Reverse Design for 1971 was discovered. RDV-007 was used on Prototype Designs with yet two new Obverse Design Varieties (ODV-010 and ODV-011)! But I wander.......</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">At anyrate, folks from the IKE Group (which had not been formed yet) began their hunt for the RDV-006 around the 2005/6 time frame. By deduction, David Golan was the primary searcher. I first became aware of the variety in early 2006 when I came across this thread from the PCGS Forums: <a href="http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=322214&messid=3144467" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=322214&messid=3144467" rel="nofollow">http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=322214&messid=3144467</a> The CONECA Description is scanned into that thread but as you can see, it's just not that definitive.</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">In May of that year I attended a coin show and started looking for the varriety. I found what I thought were 2 examples and then responded to a Wanted To Buy (WTB) thread on the PCSG Forums. I still could not absolutely state that the coin's I'd purchased were RDV-006's and relied upon the buyer to actually validate what I was selling him. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> The buyer was a fella named David Golan who later became one of the founders of the IKE Group. (He has since dropped off the charts but I happen to know that he retired to Hawaii with his family. He only occasionally checks in.) He happily validated the coin I sold him and I pocketed a nice profit! NOTHING motivates research like a nice profit! Once I received my "motivation" I made it a point to find as many of these as I could and since I still had no clue, I jumped into the research pool and made it a point to know everything I could about this variety. My searching was dedicated and many. many rolls of 1971-D IKE's were purchased and resold.</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2">What I found is best illustrated below.</font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="4"><font size="2"></font><b>Craters:</b></font> </p><p>[ATTACH]178597.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>As you can see, yes the crater above the LA in DOLLAR is different however, I found that the crater above the that one to be even easier to spot. Note that in the center of the rim closest to you, that there appears to be a rock that has broken away? That little "rock" is an eye discernable marker for the varity! Even from the lousiest of photographs, that sucker just sticks out! </p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4"><b>The Regular Earth on the left with the FEV Earth on the Right</b></font> </p><p>(Focus on the Islands and the <font size="3"><i><b>shape</b></i></font> of the Gulf of Mexico):</p><p>[ATTACH]178598.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin above shows almost 7 distinct islands off the coast of a Florida, which in itself that has a completely different shape than the regular reverse. It comes to a point and almost appears doubled. The eastern seaboard also has a distinctly different shape than on a regular reverse.</p><p>The eye discernable pickup point for this variety is the full round shape of the Gulf of Mexico. No other Eisenhower Reverse for the 1971/1972 coins has a Gulf shaped even remotely close to this!</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]178600.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b><font size="4">The Eagles:</font></b></p><p><b><font size="4"><br /></font></b></p><p><b><font size="4">[ATTACH]178599.vB[/ATTACH]</font></b></p><p><b><font size="4"><br /></font></b></p><p><b><font size="4"><br /></font></b></p><p><b><font size="4"></font></b>The Eagle, IMO, is the MOST difficult marker in identifying this particular variety! A hit placed in the right location with throw the searcher off.</p><p>While it is a "catchy" name which is right on with regard to the design, it's danged hard to spot. Personally, I prefer calling the coin a 1971-D Type 2 since every other Eisenhower Dollar is referred to as a Type coin. (1972 Type 1, 1972 Type 2, 1972 Type 3, 1976 Type 1, 1976 Type 2, etc.) To me, it;ll always be a 1971-D Type 2 although RDV-006 was it's initial name both in the CONECA Errorscope and the PCGS Forums threads.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm of the opinion, even though I've found better than a hundred of these over the years, that the variety is under appreciated just like the rest of the Eisenhower Dollar coins. We tried for years to get PCGS to attribute this variety but to no avail. I personally showed the coin along with a comparison report to Ron Guth, when he was President of PCGS, at the 2006 ANA Show in Denver, but thats as far as it went.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the July 2007 Issue of the Numismatist, the IKE Group released an article on the 1971-D RDV-006 but caled it the Friendly Eagle Pattern. This proved to be a mistake that all the pattern boys and professional numismatists were quick to point out and IMO, offered just a bit of tarnish on an otherwise remarkable coin variety.</p><p><br /></p><p>For those that may wonder, no, I'm not a member of the 7 folks that comprise "The IKE Group".</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="3"><b>Today</b></font>, PCGS does attribute this variety but at a cost of $24 per coin since it's in the CPG. This really irritates me in that the coins is not an error (More than half the Peace Dollars listed in the CPG are die break coins), it's not a die clash such as the Bugs Bunny Franklins, its not a Doubled Die, its not an RPM, and its not an overdate! It's a bonafide and easily identifiable design variety and as such should be attributed EXACTLY the same as any other bonafide variety. </p><p>Getting a 1972 Type 1, or Type 2, or Type 3 attributed costs you exactly $14. </p><p>Getting a 1964 Accented Hair Kennedy costs you exactly $14. </p><p>Getting a 1976 Type 1 Eisenhower attributed costs you exactly $14.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yet, getting the 1971-D Type 2 attributed costs exactly $38 ($14 + $24!) Arg!</p><p><br /></p><p>Look for these since they are out there and someday, they'll get the appreciation that they deserve and possibly someday, the premiums will be along the lines of the 1972 Type 2 IKE's that folks are still finding and selling raw for upwards of $30 in ratty condition. (Est mintage 200,000+) But until that day comes, this underappreciated variety will just have to wait since paying $38 to get one slabbed at MS63 is more or less a loser since it will not sell for even close to $38!</p><p><br /></p><p>High grade examples are rare though with MS66 coins bringing well over $500. However, since the grading fee/resale value equation is on the low side, expect more MS66 coins to show up in population reports than MS64 coins. This could be a bit misleading but it solely due to the grading costs associated with getting the TPG's to attribute the coin and has absolutely no reflection upon reality. MS66 is a tough grade to achienve for the 1971-S Type 2.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hav a Great Day.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 1445012, member: 15929"][SIZE=4][SIZE=2]The 1971-D Eisenhower Dollar comes with two Reverse Design Varieties (RDV). RDV-001 is the common reverse RDV-006 is the uncommon reverse. This reverse was first announced in late 1999 in CONECA's Errorscope Magazine (Nov/Dec 1999 Vol 8 No 6) a full 28 years [I]after[/I] the coin was released. The discoverer was listed as Charles Cataldo. The description was, IMO, somewhat sketchy which is typical of Eisenhower Dollar Descriptions. If you recall, the initial description for the Type 2 Eisenhower Dollar was written to thwart even the heavily interested individuals. The RDV-006 was no different. One sentence in the report states: "The crater above the LA of DOLLAR has a thick area just left of center on the inside upper lip and thick clusters of flow lines in the center and right area of the crater rim." YIKES! The pictures provided were just as confusing as they compared the Type 1 (RDV-001), Type 3 (RDV-003), and the Type 6 (RDV-006). Including the Type 3 simply clouded the explanation IMO since the Type 3 reverse was not even available when the 1971 coins were being minted so it has absolutely no relevance. In case you're curious, the numbers assigned to Design Varieties are assigned according to discovery, not when they were acutally employed. Since the RDV-006 had been identified, another Reverse Design for 1971 was discovered. RDV-007 was used on Prototype Designs with yet two new Obverse Design Varieties (ODV-010 and ODV-011)! But I wander....... At anyrate, folks from the IKE Group (which had not been formed yet) began their hunt for the RDV-006 around the 2005/6 time frame. By deduction, David Golan was the primary searcher. I first became aware of the variety in early 2006 when I came across this thread from the PCGS Forums: [URL]http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=322214&messid=3144467[/URL] The CONECA Description is scanned into that thread but as you can see, it's just not that definitive. In May of that year I attended a coin show and started looking for the varriety. I found what I thought were 2 examples and then responded to a Wanted To Buy (WTB) thread on the PCSG Forums. I still could not absolutely state that the coin's I'd purchased were RDV-006's and relied upon the buyer to actually validate what I was selling him. :o The buyer was a fella named David Golan who later became one of the founders of the IKE Group. (He has since dropped off the charts but I happen to know that he retired to Hawaii with his family. He only occasionally checks in.) He happily validated the coin I sold him and I pocketed a nice profit! NOTHING motivates research like a nice profit! Once I received my "motivation" I made it a point to find as many of these as I could and since I still had no clue, I jumped into the research pool and made it a point to know everything I could about this variety. My searching was dedicated and many. many rolls of 1971-D IKE's were purchased and resold. What I found is best illustrated below. [/SIZE][B]Craters:[/B][/SIZE] [ATTACH]178597.vB[/ATTACH] As you can see, yes the crater above the LA in DOLLAR is different however, I found that the crater above the that one to be even easier to spot. Note that in the center of the rim closest to you, that there appears to be a rock that has broken away? That little "rock" is an eye discernable marker for the varity! Even from the lousiest of photographs, that sucker just sticks out! [SIZE=4][B]The Regular Earth on the left with the FEV Earth on the Right[/B][/SIZE] (Focus on the Islands and the [SIZE=3][I][B]shape[/B][/I][/SIZE] of the Gulf of Mexico): [ATTACH]178598.vB[/ATTACH] The coin above shows almost 7 distinct islands off the coast of a Florida, which in itself that has a completely different shape than the regular reverse. It comes to a point and almost appears doubled. The eastern seaboard also has a distinctly different shape than on a regular reverse. The eye discernable pickup point for this variety is the full round shape of the Gulf of Mexico. No other Eisenhower Reverse for the 1971/1972 coins has a Gulf shaped even remotely close to this! [ATTACH]178600.vB[/ATTACH] [B][SIZE=4]The Eagles: [ATTACH]178599.vB[/ATTACH] [/SIZE][/B]The Eagle, IMO, is the MOST difficult marker in identifying this particular variety! A hit placed in the right location with throw the searcher off. While it is a "catchy" name which is right on with regard to the design, it's danged hard to spot. Personally, I prefer calling the coin a 1971-D Type 2 since every other Eisenhower Dollar is referred to as a Type coin. (1972 Type 1, 1972 Type 2, 1972 Type 3, 1976 Type 1, 1976 Type 2, etc.) To me, it;ll always be a 1971-D Type 2 although RDV-006 was it's initial name both in the CONECA Errorscope and the PCGS Forums threads. I'm of the opinion, even though I've found better than a hundred of these over the years, that the variety is under appreciated just like the rest of the Eisenhower Dollar coins. We tried for years to get PCGS to attribute this variety but to no avail. I personally showed the coin along with a comparison report to Ron Guth, when he was President of PCGS, at the 2006 ANA Show in Denver, but thats as far as it went. In the July 2007 Issue of the Numismatist, the IKE Group released an article on the 1971-D RDV-006 but caled it the Friendly Eagle Pattern. This proved to be a mistake that all the pattern boys and professional numismatists were quick to point out and IMO, offered just a bit of tarnish on an otherwise remarkable coin variety. For those that may wonder, no, I'm not a member of the 7 folks that comprise "The IKE Group". [SIZE=3][B]Today[/B][/SIZE], PCGS does attribute this variety but at a cost of $24 per coin since it's in the CPG. This really irritates me in that the coins is not an error (More than half the Peace Dollars listed in the CPG are die break coins), it's not a die clash such as the Bugs Bunny Franklins, its not a Doubled Die, its not an RPM, and its not an overdate! It's a bonafide and easily identifiable design variety and as such should be attributed EXACTLY the same as any other bonafide variety. Getting a 1972 Type 1, or Type 2, or Type 3 attributed costs you exactly $14. Getting a 1964 Accented Hair Kennedy costs you exactly $14. Getting a 1976 Type 1 Eisenhower attributed costs you exactly $14. Yet, getting the 1971-D Type 2 attributed costs exactly $38 ($14 + $24!) Arg! Look for these since they are out there and someday, they'll get the appreciation that they deserve and possibly someday, the premiums will be along the lines of the 1972 Type 2 IKE's that folks are still finding and selling raw for upwards of $30 in ratty condition. (Est mintage 200,000+) But until that day comes, this underappreciated variety will just have to wait since paying $38 to get one slabbed at MS63 is more or less a loser since it will not sell for even close to $38! High grade examples are rare though with MS66 coins bringing well over $500. However, since the grading fee/resale value equation is on the low side, expect more MS66 coins to show up in population reports than MS64 coins. This could be a bit misleading but it solely due to the grading costs associated with getting the TPG's to attribute the coin and has absolutely no reflection upon reality. MS66 is a tough grade to achienve for the 1971-S Type 2. Hav a Great Day.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
FEV or not FEV: That is the question.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...