Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;otlichnik, post: 5338254, member: 109731&quot;]The 64% from the PAS finds does indeed seem to be a special UK case.&nbsp; In Colchester Archaeological Report #4, Michael Hammerson claims that 67% of the coins of 330-348 (the period just before the FTR) in UK finds are imitative.&nbsp; This can be seen especially in the many small copies of GLORIA EXERCITVS and VICTORIAE DD AVGG Q NN found in the UK.</p><p><br /></p><p>Unfortunately, the PAS blog article still uses the extremely antiquated dating to be found in RIC.&nbsp; It is now abundantly clear that the FTR FH was not struck until 361, but ceased in 358 and that the SPES REIPVBLICE was not a contemporary type but followed it, being struck 358-361.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I outline the entire history of the study of this type, including incorporating much scholarship done since RIC, and provide a new structure and dating in my article on the Falling Horseman coinage, from KOINON II, which is now available for free download on academia.edu:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.academia.edu/44549791/Back_in_the_saddle_again_a_re_examination_of_the_FEL_TEMP_REPARATIO_Falling_horseman_type" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.academia.edu/44549791/Back_in_the_saddle_again_a_re_examination_of_the_FEL_TEMP_REPARATIO_Falling_horseman_type" rel="nofollow">https://www.academia.edu/44549791/Back_in_the_saddle_again_a_re_examination_of_the_FEL_TEMP_REPARATIO_Falling_horseman_type</a></p><p><br /></p><p>SC[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in