Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
FEL TEMP Friday! A Fallen Horseman thread.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 6515719, member: 26430"]Wow, I really love the LXXII issues (especially the Chi-type, of course!), but have yet to add one myself. Here are three others (including one from Aquileia, a Thessalonica, and Sirmium) with other field/control marks that I find interesting.</p><p><br /></p><p>And a little Julian II because his little AE3s don't get much love. According to Kent (RIC VIII pages 55-67, esp. 66), Julian's "AE 3 (small)" issues may have had a theoretical weight of 132 coins to the pound (2.46g), compared to the 72-per-lb. marked on the AE 2 types from Aquileia above (I guess they couldn't fit "CXXXII" on such a small flan!).</p><p><br /></p><p>(As always, if anyone notices an ID mistake I'm always grateful for the heads-up, and, of course, grateful to Dane Kurth for her work cataloging and making her examples accessible, as well as the work of everyone else on the FTR FH series, including several who've commented above.)</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Constantius II, Aquileia, RIC 113, AQS· in ex., A behind bust, A in field on rev.</b></p><p>I really enjoy the dramatic field symbols for Aquileia. This one also has a rather distinctive portrait of C-II:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1260498[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Constantius II. Thessalonica, RIC 129, TSЄ in ex., A behind bust, A in field on rev.</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1260500[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Constantius II. Sirmium, RIC 44, BSIRM, Δ behind bust, A beneath horse (·S· left?)</b>.</p><p>This is one's in rough shape, but I didn't have an "A" beneath horse yet. (There should also be a "·S·" but I think its off-flan and/or worn flat.)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1260499[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Julian II. Antioch, RIC 189, ANЄI in ex. </b></p><p>Julian II was the last of the primary four (five counting Magnentius) to be named on Fallen Horseman types, all struck after 361, once the flans had been reduced substantially in size from "AE 2 (Large)" to "AE 3 (Small)" (there are also series categorized as "AE 2 (Small)" and "AE 3 (Large)" in RIC VIII, and further variations for different rev. types, rulers, and mints, according to the theoretical number per lb.).</p><p><br /></p><p>Julian's are all small like this one (16mm, 2.26g, 6h).</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1260501[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 6515719, member: 26430"]Wow, I really love the LXXII issues (especially the Chi-type, of course!), but have yet to add one myself. Here are three others (including one from Aquileia, a Thessalonica, and Sirmium) with other field/control marks that I find interesting. And a little Julian II because his little AE3s don't get much love. According to Kent (RIC VIII pages 55-67, esp. 66), Julian's "AE 3 (small)" issues may have had a theoretical weight of 132 coins to the pound (2.46g), compared to the 72-per-lb. marked on the AE 2 types from Aquileia above (I guess they couldn't fit "CXXXII" on such a small flan!). (As always, if anyone notices an ID mistake I'm always grateful for the heads-up, and, of course, grateful to Dane Kurth for her work cataloging and making her examples accessible, as well as the work of everyone else on the FTR FH series, including several who've commented above.) [B]Constantius II, Aquileia, RIC 113, AQS· in ex., A behind bust, A in field on rev.[/B] I really enjoy the dramatic field symbols for Aquileia. This one also has a rather distinctive portrait of C-II: [ATTACH=full]1260498[/ATTACH] [B]Constantius II. Thessalonica, RIC 129, TSЄ in ex., A behind bust, A in field on rev.[/B] [ATTACH=full]1260500[/ATTACH] [B]Constantius II. Sirmium, RIC 44, BSIRM, Δ behind bust, A beneath horse (·S· left?)[/B]. This is one's in rough shape, but I didn't have an "A" beneath horse yet. (There should also be a "·S·" but I think its off-flan and/or worn flat.) [ATTACH=full]1260499[/ATTACH] [B]Julian II. Antioch, RIC 189, ANЄI in ex. [/B] Julian II was the last of the primary four (five counting Magnentius) to be named on Fallen Horseman types, all struck after 361, once the flans had been reduced substantially in size from "AE 2 (Large)" to "AE 3 (Small)" (there are also series categorized as "AE 2 (Small)" and "AE 3 (Large)" in RIC VIII, and further variations for different rev. types, rulers, and mints, according to the theoretical number per lb.). Julian's are all small like this one (16mm, 2.26g, 6h). [ATTACH=full]1260501[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
FEL TEMP Friday! A Fallen Horseman thread.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...