Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
February's Ancient Coin Haul!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1633463, member: 19463"]While I certainly agree that the subject needs a lot more study, I am not so restrictive on the term Limes (pronounce it leem-ace rather than like the fruit). I don't recall seeing many of these coins until the 'opening' of trade with the former Soviet bloc countries. That alone suggests that the borderlands that spawned these coins was not the Rhine that produced copy bronzes (the asses I have heard called 'Cast in Gaul' - who first applied the name Limes falsa to them?). While you hear ideas and theories without evidence to support regarding the 'why' they exist, I'd first look for their origin farther east that the Rhine. </p><p><br /></p><p>The problem with any study of unofficial coins is that you must not assume that anything you discover for one group of coins applies to all coins. It is more than likely that there were quite a number of shops producing coins other than the official mints. Even if you could prove beyond doubt that one group of coins was a semi-official municipal issue or connected in some way to Roman garrisons on the borders (Limes), you would know absolutely nothing about other coins. Some appear to be cast, some made from copy dies and some 'original' engravings. There are fully copper, silver washed, foil fourree and base silver coins as well as a few that are made in as good silver as we see from the official mints. All these have in common is what they are not - not what they are. Conventional scholars ignore these coins simply because they believe that it is meaningless to study them. While I regret this attitude, I am not sure I believe that there ever will be a good understanding of the subject and words like 'hopeless' seem reasonable to use. There was a time, for example, that modern scholars could not read Egyptian hieroglyphics but someone found the Rosetta Stone which opened the door to the language. Whether there is a document, inscription, mint site for excavation or something else that will serve as a Rosetta Stone for Limes denarii is something we can only hope for but not something which I would bet we will ever see. Meanwhile we each decide whether we want to collect them, own a couple samples or ignore them as meaningless trash. I have a few.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1633463, member: 19463"]While I certainly agree that the subject needs a lot more study, I am not so restrictive on the term Limes (pronounce it leem-ace rather than like the fruit). I don't recall seeing many of these coins until the 'opening' of trade with the former Soviet bloc countries. That alone suggests that the borderlands that spawned these coins was not the Rhine that produced copy bronzes (the asses I have heard called 'Cast in Gaul' - who first applied the name Limes falsa to them?). While you hear ideas and theories without evidence to support regarding the 'why' they exist, I'd first look for their origin farther east that the Rhine. The problem with any study of unofficial coins is that you must not assume that anything you discover for one group of coins applies to all coins. It is more than likely that there were quite a number of shops producing coins other than the official mints. Even if you could prove beyond doubt that one group of coins was a semi-official municipal issue or connected in some way to Roman garrisons on the borders (Limes), you would know absolutely nothing about other coins. Some appear to be cast, some made from copy dies and some 'original' engravings. There are fully copper, silver washed, foil fourree and base silver coins as well as a few that are made in as good silver as we see from the official mints. All these have in common is what they are not - not what they are. Conventional scholars ignore these coins simply because they believe that it is meaningless to study them. While I regret this attitude, I am not sure I believe that there ever will be a good understanding of the subject and words like 'hopeless' seem reasonable to use. There was a time, for example, that modern scholars could not read Egyptian hieroglyphics but someone found the Rosetta Stone which opened the door to the language. Whether there is a document, inscription, mint site for excavation or something else that will serve as a Rosetta Stone for Limes denarii is something we can only hope for but not something which I would bet we will ever see. Meanwhile we each decide whether we want to collect them, own a couple samples or ignore them as meaningless trash. I have a few.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
February's Ancient Coin Haul!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...