Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
February 26th: VALENTINIAN is Emperor
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8232049, member: 110350"]No write-up yet, but it's my only Valentinian I (and my third solidus overall), so here's a preview. RIC IX Antioch 2b (var. unlisted), Sear RCV V 19267 (3rd Officina), Depeyrot II 23/1 (p. 281). AD 365. 21.2 mm., 4.44 g.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1447368[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>There must be 30+ different variants of this type of Valentinian I solidus for the Antioch mint alone, depending not only on the officina number but on whether Valentinian's bust is rosette-diademed like this coin or pearl-diademed, on the presence or absence of a cross in the reverse left field, on the precise form of the device inside the labarum, and on the presence or absence of various stars and/or dots in the exergue (and/or above it) in addition to the officina number. So it's no wonder that this variant is apparently not specifically listed in RIC. The Sear RCV V 19267 catalog entry appears to be the closest description (citing Depeyrot II), since I don't have access to Depeyrot itself. (If anyone does, and could check p. 281 for me, I'd appreciate it.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8232049, member: 110350"]No write-up yet, but it's my only Valentinian I (and my third solidus overall), so here's a preview. RIC IX Antioch 2b (var. unlisted), Sear RCV V 19267 (3rd Officina), Depeyrot II 23/1 (p. 281). AD 365. 21.2 mm., 4.44 g. [ATTACH=full]1447368[/ATTACH] There must be 30+ different variants of this type of Valentinian I solidus for the Antioch mint alone, depending not only on the officina number but on whether Valentinian's bust is rosette-diademed like this coin or pearl-diademed, on the presence or absence of a cross in the reverse left field, on the precise form of the device inside the labarum, and on the presence or absence of various stars and/or dots in the exergue (and/or above it) in addition to the officina number. So it's no wonder that this variant is apparently not specifically listed in RIC. The Sear RCV V 19267 catalog entry appears to be the closest description (citing Depeyrot II), since I don't have access to Depeyrot itself. (If anyone does, and could check p. 281 for me, I'd appreciate it.)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
February 26th: VALENTINIAN is Emperor
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...