Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 1160400, member: 27832&quot;]Should&#039;ve held out for the 50/1.2L. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, while it&#039;s hard to make lenses any faster than they already are, the low-light performance of cameras has been advancing by leaps and bounds. The newest gear from Nikon in particular, but also Canon, can make shots at ISO 12800 that are significantly better than my 20D at ISO 800. That&#039;s the equivalent of moving from f/1.4 to f/0.35 -- or, sticking to the physically realizable, it means I could shoot the same exposure length at f/5.6, gaining back that depth of field you mentioned (and some sharpness, even with the 1.4L).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in