Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Faustina Friday – AVGVSTA/Ceres with a Single Torch or Scepter
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 8231373, member: 75937"]Thanks for your contribution to my post, [USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER]! </p><p><br /></p><p>Your coin is an example of a very interesting issue. It comes in two different obverse legends, the expected DIVA FAVSTINA inscription, but also with an anachronistic use of the DIVA AVG FAVSTINA inscription. Here are the examples of each from my own collction.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/faustina-sr-diva-favstina-consecratio-ceres-denarius-jpg.1370020/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>Faustina Senior, AD 138-140.</p><p>Roman AR denarius, 3.07 g, 18.6 mm, 5h.</p><p>Rome, c. AD 155-161.</p><p>Obv: DIVA FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: CONSECRATIO, Ceres (?) standing left, raising right hand and holding short torch in left.</p><p>Refs: RIC 382b; BMCRE 467-69; Cohen 165; Strack 452; RCV 4593; CRE 86.</p><p>Notes: Cohen erroneously describes the specimen in the BnF as having a veiled bust, though Strack describes the same specimen correctly. RIC cites Cohen’s description of the bust type uncritically, which is corrected in BMCRE.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/faustina-sr-diva-avg-favstina-consecratio-ceres-denarius-jpg.1370021/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>Faustina Senior, AD 138-140.</p><p>Roman AR denarius, 3.06 g, 17.5 mm, 5h.</p><p>Rome, c. AD 155-161.</p><p>Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: CONSECRATIO, Ceres (?) standing left, raising right hand and holding short torch in left.</p><p>Refs: RIC 382a; BMCRE 301; Cohen 166; Strack 424; RCV –; CRE 87.</p><p>Notes: The earlier DIVA AVG FAVSTINA legend of AD 140-145 was reintroduced on a few issues of the late 150s.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have written about the anachronistic use of the DIVA AVG FAVSTINA legend <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-%E2%80%93-late-denarius-types-with-early-obverse-legends.387138/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-%E2%80%93-late-denarius-types-with-early-obverse-legends.387138/">here</a>. The coins are dated to the "late 150s" by Beckmann (p. 71), so a bit more specific than Dinsdale (after 150).</p><p><br /></p><p>And yep, that's supposed to be Ceres' empty and open right hand.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 8231373, member: 75937"]Thanks for your contribution to my post, [USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER]! Your coin is an example of a very interesting issue. It comes in two different obverse legends, the expected DIVA FAVSTINA inscription, but also with an anachronistic use of the DIVA AVG FAVSTINA inscription. Here are the examples of each from my own collction. [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/faustina-sr-diva-favstina-consecratio-ceres-denarius-jpg.1370020/[/IMG] Faustina Senior, AD 138-140. Roman AR denarius, 3.07 g, 18.6 mm, 5h. Rome, c. AD 155-161. Obv: DIVA FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: CONSECRATIO, Ceres (?) standing left, raising right hand and holding short torch in left. Refs: RIC 382b; BMCRE 467-69; Cohen 165; Strack 452; RCV 4593; CRE 86. Notes: Cohen erroneously describes the specimen in the BnF as having a veiled bust, though Strack describes the same specimen correctly. RIC cites Cohen’s description of the bust type uncritically, which is corrected in BMCRE. [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/faustina-sr-diva-avg-favstina-consecratio-ceres-denarius-jpg.1370021/[/IMG] Faustina Senior, AD 138-140. Roman AR denarius, 3.06 g, 17.5 mm, 5h. Rome, c. AD 155-161. Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: CONSECRATIO, Ceres (?) standing left, raising right hand and holding short torch in left. Refs: RIC 382a; BMCRE 301; Cohen 166; Strack 424; RCV –; CRE 87. Notes: The earlier DIVA AVG FAVSTINA legend of AD 140-145 was reintroduced on a few issues of the late 150s. I have written about the anachronistic use of the DIVA AVG FAVSTINA legend [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-%E2%80%93-late-denarius-types-with-early-obverse-legends.387138/']here[/URL]. The coins are dated to the "late 150s" by Beckmann (p. 71), so a bit more specific than Dinsdale (after 150). And yep, that's supposed to be Ceres' empty and open right hand.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Faustina Friday – AVGVSTA/Ceres with a Single Torch or Scepter
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...