Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Faustina Friday – An Unusual Pulvinar and Peacock Denarius
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 7795934, member: 75937"]Last week's Faustina Friday was a superficial overview of nine different reverse types. Superficial can be good, but sometimes we need to go deeper.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://media1.tenor.com/images/0370865dc28ad806626731f7f7dbdf09/tenor.gif?itemid=16756828" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Sometimes we need to pull out a microscope.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://media1.tenor.com/images/c0c8b8b1a7e4310d196f2ae006c03020/tenor.gif?itemid=14212609" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yep, I'm talking about flyspecking – minor variations in design, die-studies, the works!</p><p><br /></p><p>I've written about these types before. I've discussed these <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/thrones.317164/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/thrones.317164/">here</a> and <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/rare-faustina-i-lifetime-denarius-die-study-to-boot.336597/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/rare-faustina-i-lifetime-denarius-die-study-to-boot.336597/">here,</a> as well as a left-facing bust variety <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-an-unusual-left-facing-bust-of-faustina-i.375990/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-an-unusual-left-facing-bust-of-faustina-i.375990/">here</a>. But this one is a different design variety. There is a strange, ovoid object on the seat of the throne, there is no scepter leaning against the throne, and the peacock faces left, not right. Strack describes the object on the throne as a "diadem," but it differs entirely from the crescent-shaped <a href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=struppus" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=struppus" rel="nofollow"><i>struppus</i></a> (RIC describes it as a "wreath") of the similarly-designed <a href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.377" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.377" rel="nofollow">RIC 377</a>.[1] Dinsdale believes the object most resembles a globe,[2] but it seems too flattened to be a globe, in my opinion, and the object is intended to be a cushion. The type of throne here is a <i><a href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinar" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinar" rel="nofollow">pulvinar</a></i>, a cushioned seat of a god placed before their statues and altars at the <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-lectisternium.374511/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-lectisternium.374511/"><i>lectisternium</i></a>. The term comes from <a href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinus" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinus" rel="nofollow"><i>pulvinus</i></a>, the Latin word for <i>cushion</i>, and I can think of no better explanation.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338451[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">Faustina I, AD 138-140.</font></p><p><font size="3">Roman AR denarius, 3.58 g, 16.1 mm, 7 h.</font></p><p><font size="3">Rome, AD 140.</font></p><p><font size="3">Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</font></p><p><font size="3">Rev: IVNONI REGINAE, the pulvinar of Juno, upon which rests a cushion(?); in foreground, peacock standing left, with tail in splendor.</font></p><p><font size="3">Refs: RIC –; BMCRE 139n (citing Strack); RSC 221b (citing Strack); Strack 406; RCV –; CRE 134.</font></p><p><font size="3">Notes: Ex- Tom Mullally, illustrated at <a href="http://dirtyoldbooks.com/roman/id/faustina/fa088.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://dirtyoldbooks.com/roman/id/faustina/fa088.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://dirtyoldbooks.com/roman/id/faustina/fa088.jpg</a> (<a href="http://www.dirtyoldcoins.com" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.dirtyoldcoins.com" rel="nofollow">www.dirtyoldcoins.com</a>). [USER=99239]@Suarez[/USER] <i>ERIC II</i> plate coin, type 107, p. 224. </font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>The coin is scarce. Strack cites five museum specimens: the Staatliches Münzkabinett in Berlin, the Staatliches Münzkabinett in Stuttgart, the Herzogliches Münzkabinett in Gotha, the Hermitage in St. Petersburg, and a single specimen from the Rēka Devnia hoard in the Nationalmuseum in Sofia. Strack illustrates the Berlin specimen (see below), but unfortunately, I am unable to find any photos online of the other four specimens he cites. I have, however, been able to find an additional four examples in online databases and print publications. The coin seems to have been struck with three different reverse dies, so the variations in the design do not merely represent a single erroneously engraved die intended to be RIC 339a (<a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1844-0425-980" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1844-0425-980" rel="nofollow">BMCRE 139</a>).</p><p><br /></p><p>Three are reverse die-matches to my coin. On this die, the reverse legend is broken by the back of the throne and the wave decoration on the top of the back of the throne is taller on the left than the right.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338452[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">American Numismatic Society <a href="http://numismatics.org/collection/1944.100.48325" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/collection/1944.100.48325" rel="nofollow">1944.100.48325</a>.</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338455[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">Solidus Auktion 11, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3605603" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3605603" rel="nofollow">lot 276</a>, 14 January 2017.</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338454[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">Naumann Auction 74, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5631707" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5631707" rel="nofollow">lot 342</a>, 3 February 2019.</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>The plate coin in Strack was struck with a similar die, but the wave decoration on the top of the back of the throne is taller on the right than the left.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338456[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">Strack 406, pl. 6.</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>The plate coin in Tameryazev & Makarenko[3] was struck with a die featuring an unbroken reverse legend, though the artwork on the devices is so similar as to have been engraved by the same hand as previous two dies.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1338453[/ATTACH]</p><blockquote><p><font size="3">CRE 134 (private Eastern European collection).</font></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I hope you enjoy these weekly articles about my favorite two empresses. If you know of any other examples of this coin, I'd love to see them to further my die-study.</p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i> </i></p><p><i>As always, comments are welcome. Post anything you feel is relevant! </i></p><p><br /></p><p>And TGIFF!!</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://media1.tenor.com/images/c1d065eebc3d10a26859ed4b503b1221/tenor.gif?itemid=16247074" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>~~~</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Notes</b></p><p><br /></p><p>1. Strack, Paul L. <i>Untersuchungen Zur Romischen Reichspragung Des Zweiten Jahrhunderts</i>. vol. 3, Die Reichsprägung zur Zeit des Antoninus Pius. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 1937, s.v. no. 406.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Paul H Dinsdale, <i>Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius Caesar AD 138-161, Second Revised Edition.</i> Leeds, 2021, p. 109, n.4.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Temeryazev, S. A., and T. P. Makarenko. <i>The Coinage of Roman Empresses, </i>134, p. 52.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 7795934, member: 75937"]Last week's Faustina Friday was a superficial overview of nine different reverse types. Superficial can be good, but sometimes we need to go deeper. [IMG]https://media1.tenor.com/images/0370865dc28ad806626731f7f7dbdf09/tenor.gif?itemid=16756828[/IMG] Sometimes we need to pull out a microscope. [IMG]https://media1.tenor.com/images/c0c8b8b1a7e4310d196f2ae006c03020/tenor.gif?itemid=14212609[/IMG] Yep, I'm talking about flyspecking – minor variations in design, die-studies, the works! I've written about these types before. I've discussed these [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/thrones.317164/']here[/URL] and [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/rare-faustina-i-lifetime-denarius-die-study-to-boot.336597/']here,[/URL] as well as a left-facing bust variety [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/faustina-friday-an-unusual-left-facing-bust-of-faustina-i.375990/']here[/URL]. But this one is a different design variety. There is a strange, ovoid object on the seat of the throne, there is no scepter leaning against the throne, and the peacock faces left, not right. Strack describes the object on the throne as a "diadem," but it differs entirely from the crescent-shaped [URL='http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=struppus'][I]struppus[/I][/URL] (RIC describes it as a "wreath") of the similarly-designed [URL='http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.377']RIC 377[/URL].[1] Dinsdale believes the object most resembles a globe,[2] but it seems too flattened to be a globe, in my opinion, and the object is intended to be a cushion. The type of throne here is a [I][URL='http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinar']pulvinar[/URL][/I], a cushioned seat of a god placed before their statues and altars at the [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-lectisternium.374511/'][I]lectisternium[/I][/URL]. The term comes from [URL='http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dpulvinus'][I]pulvinus[/I][/URL], the Latin word for [I]cushion[/I], and I can think of no better explanation. [ATTACH=full]1338451[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]Faustina I, AD 138-140. Roman AR denarius, 3.58 g, 16.1 mm, 7 h. Rome, AD 140. Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: IVNONI REGINAE, the pulvinar of Juno, upon which rests a cushion(?); in foreground, peacock standing left, with tail in splendor. Refs: RIC –; BMCRE 139n (citing Strack); RSC 221b (citing Strack); Strack 406; RCV –; CRE 134. Notes: Ex- Tom Mullally, illustrated at [URL]http://dirtyoldbooks.com/roman/id/faustina/fa088.jpg[/URL] ([URL='http://www.dirtyoldcoins.com']www.dirtyoldcoins.com[/URL]). [USER=99239]@Suarez[/USER] [I]ERIC II[/I] plate coin, type 107, p. 224. [/SIZE][/INDENT] The coin is scarce. Strack cites five museum specimens: the Staatliches Münzkabinett in Berlin, the Staatliches Münzkabinett in Stuttgart, the Herzogliches Münzkabinett in Gotha, the Hermitage in St. Petersburg, and a single specimen from the Rēka Devnia hoard in the Nationalmuseum in Sofia. Strack illustrates the Berlin specimen (see below), but unfortunately, I am unable to find any photos online of the other four specimens he cites. I have, however, been able to find an additional four examples in online databases and print publications. The coin seems to have been struck with three different reverse dies, so the variations in the design do not merely represent a single erroneously engraved die intended to be RIC 339a ([URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1844-0425-980']BMCRE 139[/URL]). Three are reverse die-matches to my coin. On this die, the reverse legend is broken by the back of the throne and the wave decoration on the top of the back of the throne is taller on the left than the right. [ATTACH=full]1338452[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]American Numismatic Society [URL='http://numismatics.org/collection/1944.100.48325']1944.100.48325[/URL].[/SIZE][/INDENT] [ATTACH=full]1338455[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]Solidus Auktion 11, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3605603']lot 276[/URL], 14 January 2017.[/SIZE][/INDENT] [ATTACH=full]1338454[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]Naumann Auction 74, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5631707']lot 342[/URL], 3 February 2019.[/SIZE][/INDENT] The plate coin in Strack was struck with a similar die, but the wave decoration on the top of the back of the throne is taller on the right than the left. [ATTACH=full]1338456[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]Strack 406, pl. 6.[/SIZE][/INDENT] The plate coin in Tameryazev & Makarenko[3] was struck with a die featuring an unbroken reverse legend, though the artwork on the devices is so similar as to have been engraved by the same hand as previous two dies. [ATTACH=full]1338453[/ATTACH] [INDENT][SIZE=3]CRE 134 (private Eastern European collection).[/SIZE][/INDENT] I hope you enjoy these weekly articles about my favorite two empresses. If you know of any other examples of this coin, I'd love to see them to further my die-study. [I] As always, comments are welcome. Post anything you feel is relevant! [/I] And TGIFF!! [IMG]https://media1.tenor.com/images/c1d065eebc3d10a26859ed4b503b1221/tenor.gif?itemid=16247074[/IMG] ~~~ [B]Notes[/B] 1. Strack, Paul L. [I]Untersuchungen Zur Romischen Reichspragung Des Zweiten Jahrhunderts[/I]. vol. 3, Die Reichsprägung zur Zeit des Antoninus Pius. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 1937, s.v. no. 406. 2. Paul H Dinsdale, [I]Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius Caesar AD 138-161, Second Revised Edition.[/I] Leeds, 2021, p. 109, n.4. 3. Temeryazev, S. A., and T. P. Makarenko. [I]The Coinage of Roman Empresses, [/I]134, p. 52.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Faustina Friday – An Unusual Pulvinar and Peacock Denarius
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...