Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;curtislclay, post: 4942047, member: 89514&quot;]VENERI VICTR bronze coins in my B.Litt. thesis (Oxford, 1972):</p><p><br /></p><p>Sestertii: 34 spec., 11 obv. and 13 rev. dies</p><p><br /></p><p>Ryro: new die comb., o400/r578</p><p><br /></p><p>Doug first: Cat. 1639, o399/r584, 1 spec.</p><p><br /></p><p>Doug second: Cat. 1625, o395/r577, 3 spec.</p><p><br /></p><p>RomColl: new die comb., o398/r589</p><p><br /></p><p>Middle bronzes: 12 spec., from 3 obv. and 3 rev. dies.</p><p><br /></p><p>Doug third: Cat. 511, o138/r185, 4 spec.</p><p><br /></p><p>I wouldn&#039;t bother quoting Hill, incidentally, since his works on the Antonine and Severan coinage are largely mere speculation, so much more often wrong than right. So he assigns Domna&#039;s VENERI VICTR type to 194. Actually 193, according to my research. According to Hill Domna was not declared Augusta until c. Spring 194; correct date c. June 193, immediately after Septimius&#039; accession. VENERI VICTR was her first coin type at Rome.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in