Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Fake Rainbow Toned Coins - Artificial Colors
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Boss, post: 541745, member: 15110"]Boss: I think the QT designation would cause the whole community to question their own slabbed toned coins. That would the same as CAC as far as I am concerned. All of a sudden people would be fearful and unsure of their own toned coins and all potential purchases. Having a QT on the coin would be like saying "altered surfaces" , cleaned, etc.. This would have the same effect as "genuine". Anyone bought a genuine PCGS lately? Unless it's an ultra rarity I don't think you'll be doing this any time soon, unless you want to crack out and sell raw which would actually make more money on the coin. Are they going to start a registry set of genuines with a big "1" point per coin. 50 coins=50 points. Yippy! </p><p> </p><p>Also I am not sure if the TPG's want the doctors out of business. I think we would love to be a fly on the wall in the closed door P&L reviews at PCGS and NGC with the big dogs. They are a for profit business. Coin doctors create multiple resubmissions trying to either get their coins graded or upgraded. Strict criteria will stop this. (Lehigh- I think?? you already admitted they don't follow their stated criteria, so they are inconsistent). Lot's of people affected. I think the system is fine the way it is. If your good enough to fool the TPG's who by experience alone are the experts (imagine looking at coins 40 hours a week year after year and having to get agreement with 2 other professionals on the grade??) I for once, entirely agree with Doug here. Also, I think toned coins are more attractive than non toned and frankly if the coins are hairlined or damaged under the toning then the coin is actually protected. It's better than verdigris filling in the damage which is often the case.</p><p> </p><p>For Mike: I don't really know how to quote 2 different poeple in posts without cut and paste. I will lay off the novice references. I have only been involved in coins a couple years. I feel most here have been doing it a lot longer so I don't feel I have earned a lot of speaking power. If you go on Collector's Universe you really get that feeling. Stewart Blaine? talking about selling another memember an 80K coin like it was buying some new pants. Talk about intimidating. I will only occassionally lurk there. Thanks for the credit, BTW.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Boss, post: 541745, member: 15110"]Boss: I think the QT designation would cause the whole community to question their own slabbed toned coins. That would the same as CAC as far as I am concerned. All of a sudden people would be fearful and unsure of their own toned coins and all potential purchases. Having a QT on the coin would be like saying "altered surfaces" , cleaned, etc.. This would have the same effect as "genuine". Anyone bought a genuine PCGS lately? Unless it's an ultra rarity I don't think you'll be doing this any time soon, unless you want to crack out and sell raw which would actually make more money on the coin. Are they going to start a registry set of genuines with a big "1" point per coin. 50 coins=50 points. Yippy! Also I am not sure if the TPG's want the doctors out of business. I think we would love to be a fly on the wall in the closed door P&L reviews at PCGS and NGC with the big dogs. They are a for profit business. Coin doctors create multiple resubmissions trying to either get their coins graded or upgraded. Strict criteria will stop this. (Lehigh- I think?? you already admitted they don't follow their stated criteria, so they are inconsistent). Lot's of people affected. I think the system is fine the way it is. If your good enough to fool the TPG's who by experience alone are the experts (imagine looking at coins 40 hours a week year after year and having to get agreement with 2 other professionals on the grade??) I for once, entirely agree with Doug here. Also, I think toned coins are more attractive than non toned and frankly if the coins are hairlined or damaged under the toning then the coin is actually protected. It's better than verdigris filling in the damage which is often the case. For Mike: I don't really know how to quote 2 different poeple in posts without cut and paste. I will lay off the novice references. I have only been involved in coins a couple years. I feel most here have been doing it a lot longer so I don't feel I have earned a lot of speaking power. If you go on Collector's Universe you really get that feeling. Stewart Blaine? talking about selling another memember an 80K coin like it was buying some new pants. Talk about intimidating. I will only occassionally lurk there. Thanks for the credit, BTW.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Fake Rainbow Toned Coins - Artificial Colors
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...