Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 541234, member: 2972&quot;]That is precisely what I am suggesting.&nbsp; AT coins that the TPGs consider &quot;market acceptable&quot; yet they know full well the coins are AT.&nbsp; These are not QT coins, they are no-brainer AT coins that the TPGs choose to look the other way on.</p><p><br /></p><p>What&#039;s worse is that this is only one group of coins that are deemed &quot;market acceptable&quot; -- yet there are others.&nbsp; Many album toned coins are what I would call AT (or at best QT), and the same goes for envelope toned coins.&nbsp; Could be NT could be AT -- therefore I call them QT.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, I understand your intent is not to call these coins AT, and I will not include them in the list -- but suffice to say that most album and envelope toned coins are called into question based on what I&#039;ve seen, heard, and learned about this topic over the years.</p><p><br /></p><p>That doesn&#039;t make them any less pretty though, as you point out.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Respectfully...Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in