Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tokenfreak, post: 2046313, member: 73113&quot;]Ok, thanks for the information.&nbsp; I just wasn&#039;t sure how much weight loss would be consider normal for wear and tear on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I did not mention any as I do not currently have a caliper to measure diameter or thickness.&nbsp; I have order one though and will have one soon.&nbsp; The 1882 coin does a little larger diameter just by comparing the two.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The 1887 coin I bought was advertised as XF-VF grade.&nbsp; I guess it really wasn&#039;t?&nbsp; I am building my collection up so I should be getting more Morgan dollars soon, but I need to be able to tell the fakes from the reals so that is what I am trying to learn.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks, I am glad to be here.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I am going to try and return it through eBay.&nbsp; The seller does have a 100% feedback, but not much feedback.&nbsp; It may have been a mistake or on purpose I&#039;m not sure.&nbsp; Hopefully, I can get a refund.&nbsp; We shall see.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, the fake 1882 also has a larger diameter than the 1887, but not by too much.&nbsp; I don&#039;t currently have a caliper to measure it precisely, but will be able to soon.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in