Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 3167801, member: 36230&quot;]I wasn&#039;t trying to blame you for not providing details and assumed you had posted all you had. It&#039;s just something that can make nailing things down much easier. Other than not being a rev of 78, it&#039;s been so long that I forget other reverse tells.</p><p><br /></p><p>So many folks just love to point the fake finger whenever anything looks off, often ignoring the fact we&#039;re looking at photos where perspective matters. Additionally, just think of how many times we&#039;ve seen someone pick some seemingly obvious detail about a coin and use it to deem it fake while wholly ignoring the often-fact that everything else is correct? If someone is going to make the effort to make a near-perfect counterfeit, do they really think such a person would ignore the obvious? It&#039;s like the &quot;cast&quot; thing so many resort to; it&#039;s usually nothing but an assumption.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in